> On 21 Feb 2017, at 8:16 am, Ryan Sleevi via Public <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 6:23 PM, Curt Spann via Public <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > Apple votes Abstain. > > Curt > > Curt, > > To the extent you can comment for Apple, can you clarify whether the > abstention is related to: > - Duration of validity (13 months) > - Time to phase in (6 months) > - Other?
We discussed this inside Apple, and came to the conclusion that while there was probably a small net benefit, there was uncertainty about the benefits and the costs, especially on the side of increasing costs, and a possibility the costs far outweighed the benefits. All factors you mention were involved in the conclusion. We would likely support a reduction to 27 months, with a reasonable phase-in time. This would significantly reduce the uncertainty in the cost/benefit analysis because it is already in use for EV and because it has had more warning time.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Public mailing list [email protected] https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
