At least one of those is part of ballot 190
From: Public [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dimitris Zacharopoulos via Public Sent: Saturday, April 29, 2017 1:22 PM To: [email protected] Cc: Dimitris Zacharopoulos <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [cabfpub] Baseline Requirements v. 1.4.6 Ben, At some point we should also fix the incorrect references pointing to Section 3.3.1 instead of 4.2.1, that have been identified in Sections 3.2.2.4 and 4.1.2. Dimitris. On 29/4/2017 12:34 πμ, Ben Wilson via Public wrote: All versions are now posted here - https://cabforum.org/baseline-requirements-documents/ I will upload them to the wiki and update the GitHub version. From: Public [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ben Wilson via Public Sent: Friday, April 28, 2017 1:51 PM To: CABFPub <mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]> Cc: Ben Wilson <mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]> Subject: [cabfpub] Baseline Requirements v. 1.4.6 All, I am in the process of updating the web page for the Baseline Requirements and creating a version 1.4.7 of the Baseline Requirements based on adoption of Ballot 196 - Define "Audit Period". In that process, I compared version 1.4.6 on GitHub with a Word version (which I’ve used in the past to create the PDFs that we post on cabforum.org), and I noticed some minor discrepancies. Until we abandon one version over the other (and maybe we’re at that point), it is important to ensure consistency between GitHub and Word. I made changes to both the GitHub version (see https://github.com/cabforum/documents/pull/54/commits/5033553107cad20ac26b8c185b6006463f8df013) and the Word version (redlined version attached as PDF) to make them more consistent. My belief is that with these edits that they are now consistent (except for instances where section headings have been capitalized in one version or the other), and that they reflect the current state of the Baseline Requirements (as of Ballot 195 – CAA Fixup, provided that no exclusion notices are filed during the IPR review period). Before I proceed with creating a version 1.4.7 of the BRs, I thought I’d give anyone a chance to object, correct me where I’m wrong, etc. Please review. Thanks, Ben _______________________________________________ Public mailing list [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Public mailing list [email protected] https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
