Yeah, those should be done by ballot, just to make sure everyone understands the implications and interpretation :)
On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 1:12 PM, Jeremy Rowley via Public < [email protected]> wrote: > At least one of those is part of ballot 190 > > > > *From:* Public [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Dimitris > Zacharopoulos via Public > *Sent:* Saturday, April 29, 2017 1:22 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Cc:* Dimitris Zacharopoulos <[email protected]> > *Subject:* Re: [cabfpub] Baseline Requirements v. 1.4.6 > > > > Ben, > > At some point we should also fix the incorrect references pointing to > Section 3.3.1 instead of 4.2.1, that have been identified in Sections > 3.2.2.4 and 4.1.2. > > > Dimitris. > > On 29/4/2017 12:34 πμ, Ben Wilson via Public wrote: > > All versions are now posted here - https://cabforum.org/baseline- > requirements-documents/ > > I will upload them to the wiki and update the GitHub version. > > *From:* Public [mailto:[email protected] > <[email protected]>] *On Behalf Of *Ben Wilson via Public > *Sent:* Friday, April 28, 2017 1:51 PM > *To:* CABFPub <[email protected]> <[email protected]> > *Cc:* Ben Wilson <[email protected]> <[email protected]> > *Subject:* [cabfpub] Baseline Requirements v. 1.4.6 > > > > All, > > > > I am in the process of updating the web page for the Baseline > Requirements and creating a version 1.4.7 of the Baseline Requirements > based on adoption of Ballot 196 - Define "Audit Period". In that process, > I compared version 1.4.6 on GitHub with a Word version (which I’ve used in > the past to create the PDFs that we post on cabforum.org), and I noticed > some minor discrepancies. > > > > Until we abandon one version over the other (and maybe we’re at that > point), it is important to ensure consistency between GitHub and Word. I > made changes to both the GitHub version (see https://github.com/cabforum/ > documents/pull/54/commits/5033553107cad20ac26b8c185b6006463f8df013) and > the Word version (redlined version attached as PDF) to make them more > consistent. My belief is that with these edits that they are now > consistent (except for instances where section headings have been > capitalized in one version or the other), and that they reflect the current > state of the Baseline Requirements (as of Ballot 195 – CAA Fixup, provided > that no exclusion notices are filed during the IPR review period). > > > > Before I proceed with creating a version 1.4.7 of the BRs, I thought I’d > give anyone a chance to object, correct me where I’m wrong, etc. Please > review. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Ben > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Public mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public > > > > _______________________________________________ > Public mailing list > [email protected] > https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public > >
_______________________________________________ Public mailing list [email protected] https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
