Hi Moudrick,

I am just asking opinions; and I am not (necessarily) referring to any current or future Ballot.

And I am not making proposals of any kind -- just asking opinions. If there aren't any, then I will take note that it's a non-issue :)


Rgds
Adriano


Il 17/05/2017 12:46, Moudrick M. Dadashov ha scritto:
Hi Adriano,

Like for other Subject attributes, primary source of "address" is the official legal entity registry where content of the address is country specific. Just curious, why are we creating new problems (see "state", "locality" (that in some jurisdictions have absolutely no meaning) related discussions)? Our vote for this ballot will be No.

Thanks,
M.D.
 

On 5/17/2017 1:08 PM, Adriano Santoni via Public wrote:

All, would like some opinions about the following question:

Can it be considered "okay" if the streetAddress component of an OV (or EV) certificate Subject contains some more information than it's strictly specified (or, more exactly, exemplified) in ITU-T X.520 ?

ITU-T X.520 (aka ISO/IEC 9594-6) reads:
"The Street Address attribute type specifies a site for the local distribution and physical delivery in a postal address,
i.e., the street name, place, avenue and house number"

For instance, how would you consider a street Address that, in addition to street name and house number, also contains a country name: compliant? non-compliant? of dubious compliance?

Adriano



_______________________________________________
Public mailing list
[email protected]
https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public


--

Cordiali saluti,

Adriano Santoni
ACTALIS S.p.A.
(Aruba Group)



Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: Firma crittografica S/MIME

_______________________________________________
Public mailing list
[email protected]
https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public

Reply via email to