|
Here is an example: (please note: it's a fake one, generated via an on-line fake address generator) In the above example, streetAddress not only contains a street name and house number, but other info as well, including the locality (already specified in the separate localityName attribute) and the country (already specified in the separate countryName attribute), and a postal code that should probably be moved elsewhere (e.g. in the specific postalCode attribute, if used). It is quite obvious, in the above example, that the address information are consistent, overall. The question I am asking is: is this way of populating streetAddress okay, from a compliance point of view? Does anybody think that such a certificate should be regarded as non-conformant to the BRs ? Adriano Il 18/05/2017 00:04, Geoff Keating ha
scritto:
--
Cordiali saluti, |
smime.p7s
Description: Firma crittografica S/MIME
_______________________________________________ Public mailing list [email protected] https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
