We will endorse
> On Jun 3, 2017, at 3:16 PM, Dean Coclin via Public <[email protected]> > wrote: > > To be clear, I wasn’t suggesting a delay, rather, something that would be > done in parallel. But your call, either way is fine with me. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Gervase Markham [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Saturday, June 3, 2017 5:12 PM > To: Dean Coclin <[email protected]>; CA/Browser Forum Public > Discussion List <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [cabfpub] Fairly Urgent: Draft Network Security Working Group > charter ballot > >> On 03/06/17 21:59, Dean Coclin wrote: >> Very good Gerv. It might also be useful to get a show of hands as to who >> would participate in this WG as it wouldn't make sense to form it if we >> don't get enough participants. My sense from the last F2F is that we will, >> but perhaps a poll would give the group a better indication as to who would >> actually be involved in researching and drafting. Of course, this is not >> required to form the group. Involvement of Interested Parties with domain >> expertise would be especially beneficial. > > I think we should pass the ballot, form the group, and if it turns out no-one > wants to join it I'll join, elect myself as chair, and close it down again. > > Let's not delay this with more straw polling. The best way this group can get > off to a good start is having a face-to-face meeting in Berlin, and for that > to happen, the ballot needs to start the process on Monday. > > Gerv > _______________________________________________ > Public mailing list > [email protected] > https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public _______________________________________________ Public mailing list [email protected] https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
