Hi Gerv, we'll endorse your proposal.
Thanks,
M.D.
On 6/4/2017 12:12 AM, Gervase Markham via Public wrote:
On 03/06/17 21:59, Dean Coclin wrote:
Very good Gerv. It might also be useful to get a show of hands as to who would
participate in this WG as it wouldn't make sense to form it if we don't get
enough participants. My sense from the last F2F is that we will, but perhaps a
poll would give the group a better indication as to who would actually be
involved in researching and drafting. Of course, this is not required to form
the group. Involvement of Interested Parties with domain expertise would be
especially beneficial.
I think we should pass the ballot, form the group, and if it turns out
no-one wants to join it I'll join, elect myself as chair, and close it
down again.
Let's not delay this with more straw polling. The best way this group
can get off to a good start is having a face-to-face meeting in Berlin,
and for that to happen, the ballot needs to start the process on Monday.
Gerv
_______________________________________________
Public mailing list
[email protected]
https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
_______________________________________________
Public mailing list
[email protected]
https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
