Perhaps we should have a general rule that all RFC references mean a reference to the RFC plus all approved errata?
> On 5 Jun 2017, at 9:04 am, Phillip via Public <[email protected]> wrote: > > Implementation of CAA turned up an issue to do with the recursive treatment > of pointer records. An errata has been proposed to fix the specification to > achieve the processing agreed to be desirable: > > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?eid=4992 > > I would like to propose a motion to fix this issue so that implementations > use the search specified in the errata rather than the original text.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Public mailing list [email protected] https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
