On 06/06/17 09:42, Gervase Markham via Public wrote: > So if and when we do think PHB's algorithm tweak is both stably defined > and an improvement, then amending the BRs to specifically incorporate > the erratum seems like the right fix, because that erratum can not be > Verified (which would mean it was automatically incorporated).
Further to this, I am advised that although errata numbers are supposed to be stable for a given version of the text, this is not to be relied upon. I therefore suggest that, once the errata text is stable and agreed to be correct, we incorporate the text directly into the BRs. Gerv _______________________________________________ Public mailing list [email protected] https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
