I’ve pushed a change to fix this typo. Thanks for noticing! > On Jun 22, 2017, at 1:50 AM, Tim Shirley <[email protected]> wrote: > > On the ASN.1 change, there’s a pervasive typo between line 1707 and 1733 of > “id-evat-jursidiction” rather than “id-evat-jurisdiction” (10 instances in > all). Otherwise, looks good to me. > > From: Public <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of CABFPub > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > Reply-To: CABFPub <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > Date: Sunday, June 18, 2017 at 5:52 PM > To: CABFPub <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > Cc: "[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> > Subject: [cabfpub] Four sets of changes for proposed ballots > > I’ve promised a bunch of people to propose changes and fell rather behind. > So now I’ve got four sets of changes that need review for possible ballots: > > https://github.com/cabforum/documents/compare/master...pzb:dnqualifier?expand=1 > > <https://scanmail.trustwave.com/?c=4062&d=5fbG2TDF2qtBmAdXCVLnlvT33gN9b4Efm1xHgIDjyw&s=5&u=https%3a%2f%2fgithub%2ecom%2fcabforum%2fdocuments%2fcompare%2fmaster%2e%2e%2epzb%3adnqualifier%3fexpand%3d1> > adds dnQualifier as an allowed attribute for all certificate types > (including DV) > > https://github.com/cabforum/documents/compare/master...pzb:evj-asn?expand=1 > <https://scanmail.trustwave.com/?c=4062&d=5fbG2TDF2qtBmAdXCVLnlvT33gN9b4Efm10R09DkzA&s=5&u=https%3a%2f%2fgithub%2ecom%2fcabforum%2fdocuments%2fcompare%2fmaster%2e%2e%2epzb%3aevj-asn%3fexpand%3d1> > adds ASN.1 info on the EV jurisdiction attribute types > > https://github.com/cabforum/documents/compare/master...pzb:ev-liability?expand=1 > > <https://scanmail.trustwave.com/?c=4062&d=5fbG2TDF2qtBmAdXCVLnlvT33gN9b4EfmwcU0tWyng&s=5&u=https%3a%2f%2fgithub%2ecom%2fcabforum%2fdocuments%2fcompare%2fmaster%2e%2e%2epzb%3aev-liability%3fexpand%3d1> > adds language to the EV guidelines to clarify that CAs may limit their > aggregate liabilities > > https://github.com/cabforum/documents/compare/master...pzb:underscores?expand=1 > > <https://scanmail.trustwave.com/?c=4062&d=5fbG2TDF2qtBmAdXCVLnlvT33gN9b4Efm1UQhte2ng&s=5&u=https%3a%2f%2fgithub%2ecom%2fcabforum%2fdocuments%2fcompare%2fmaster%2e%2e%2epzb%3aunderscores%3fexpand%3d1> > allows underscores in domain names and clarifies what can go in common > names. This builds on Ben Wilson’s draft (thanks Ben!) > > I still need to update the proposal to add SRVname as an allowed type of > subject alternative name. This will be a separate ballot. > > I would appreciate feedback on any or all of these. > > Thanks, > Peter
_______________________________________________ Public mailing list [email protected] https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
