To clarify, I was requesting to discuss if common browser UI should be discussed at the CAB Forum and if it had been discussed in the past what was the outcome of those discussions. Currently we are not looking to participate in a browser UI working group.
Cheers, Curt > On Jul 13, 2017, at 11:51 AM, Kirk Hall via Public <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Sounds good. Our next teleconference is a week from today, and I’ll schedule > a block of time. > > From: Public [mailto:[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf Of Mike Reilly (WDG) via > Public > Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2017 11:16 AM > To: CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> > Cc: Nate Santiago <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > Subject: [EXTERNAL][cabfpub] CABForum Teleconference Proposed Topic: Common > Browser UI Security Indicators > > Hi Kirk. Curt Spann (Apple) and I would like some time on the next CABF > teleconference to talk about coordinating browser UI security indicators for > TLS/SSL certs. We have an interest in this area, and would like feedback > from other browsers and CAs on the following: > > Should browsers work toward a common browser UI security indicators related > to certificates? > With the move to 100% encryption, what indicator should DV, OV, and EV sites > receive? > Should we set up a new Browser UI Working Group within the Forum under the > new governance structure to work on this topic? > > Can we block out some time on the next call for this topic? Thanks, Mike > > Mike Reilly | Principal PM Lead, Risk Management & Crypto Ecosystem > Windows and Devices Group (WDG) InfoSec > _______________________________________________ > Public mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public > <https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public>
_______________________________________________ Public mailing list [email protected] https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
