Virginia, one quick suggestion – change Sec. 3 of the ballot to specify that the Ballot will not take effect until the charter for a new Web Server Working Group (to take the current substantive functions of the Forum) has been approved by Ballot. Otherwise, once this Ballot is approved we can’t operate as we do as present, but likewise we can’t operate as the new Web Server Working Group until a new charter has been approved. You could add this to Sec. 3:
3. Applicability of Amendments. The amendments to the IPR Policy and the Bylaws described in this ballot shall not take effect until a charter for a new Working Group to perform the substantive activities of the current CA/Browser Forum concerning server certificates has been approved by ballot. The amendments to the IPR Policy and the Bylaws described in this ballot shall become effective when the vote for approval becomes effective is final, and shall not apply retroactively. Any Draft Guideline Ballots already in the Review Period when such amendments go into effect shall comply with the versions of the IPR Policy and the Bylaws in effect when such Review Period began. From: Public [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Virginia Fournier via Public Sent: Monday, August 14, 2017 2:32 PM To: Peter Bowen <[email protected]> Cc: CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List <[email protected]> Subject: [EXTERNAL]Re: [cabfpub] pre-Ballot 206: Creation of Working Groups Hi Peter (and all), Here are updated documents that reflect your comments. Please also see my responses below. To make the documents easier to read, I have accepted all other changes. This is LAST CALL to everyone for comments on these documents. We’re going to start the formal discussion period in the next couple of days. Best regards, Virginia Fournier Senior Standards Counsel Apple Inc. ☏ 669-227-9595 ✉︎ [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
_______________________________________________ Public mailing list [email protected] https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
