Apple votes yes.

Curt

> On Sep 12, 2017, at 3:23 PM, Kirk Hall via Public <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Voting has started on Ballot 190 as proposed on Sept 5 (see bottom of this 
> message, and attachments), as amended by my email from Sept. 11 (see 
> immediately below).  Voting runs through Sept. 19 at 18:00 UTC.
>  
> Entrust votes yes.
>  
> From: Public [mailto:[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf Of Kirk Hall via Public
> Sent: Monday, September 11, 2017 6:01 AM
> To: CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>>
> Subject: [EXTERNAL][cabfpub] Two amendments to Ballot 190
>  
> The proposer and endorsers are making two minor amendments to Ballot 190 as 
> follows.
>  
> 1) In BR 3.2.2.4.6 "Agreed-Upon Change to Website", the current draft Version 
> 8 still has the typo "Request Value" that crept in sometime around BR 1.4. It 
> should be "Random Value".  Accordingly, BR 3.2.2.4.6 in Ballot 190 is changed 
> to read as follows:
>  
> 3.2.2.4.6 Agreed-Upon Change to Website
>  
> Confirming the Applicant's control over the FQDN by confirming one of the 
> following under the "/.well-known/pki-validation" directory, or another path 
> registered with IANA for the purpose of Domain Validation, on the 
> Authorization Domain Name that is accessible by the CA via HTTP/HTTPS over an 
> Authorized Port:
>  
> 1.       The presence of Required Website Content contained in the content of 
> a file. The entire Required Website Content MUST NOT appear in the request 
> used to retrieve the file or web page, or
>  
> 2.       The presence of the Request Token or Request Random Value contained 
> in the content of a file where the Request Token or Random Value MUST NOT 
> appear in the request. ***
>  
> 2) In Version 8 of BR 3.2.2.4.7, "DNS Change", the current language says:
>  
> "Confirming the Applicant's control over the FQDN by confirming the presence 
> of a Random Value or Request Token for either in a DNS CNAME, TXT or CAA 
> record for either 1) an Authorization Domain Name; or 2) an Authorization 
> Domain Name that is prefixed with a label that begins with an underscore 
> character." 
>  
> Note that "for either" appears twice in the sentence, and we think the first 
> occurrence should be deleted.  Accordingly, BR 3.2.2.4.7 in Ballot 190 is 
> changed to read as follows:
>  
> 3.2.2.4.7  DNS Change <>
> Confirming the Applicant's control over the FQDN by confirming the presence 
> of a Random Value or Request Token for either in a DNS CNAME, TXT or CAA 
> record for either 1) an Authorization Domain Name; or 2) an Authorization 
> Domain Name that is prefixed with a label that begins with an underscore 
> character.
> 
>  
> 
> Voting on Ballot 190 will begin tomorrow, and the text has been changed as 
> shown above.
> 
> ***
> From: Public [mailto:[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf Of Kirk Hall via Public
> Sent: Tuesday, September 5, 2017 10:52 AM
> To: CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>>
> Subject: [EXTERNAL][cabfpub] Ballot 190 - Discussion Period is starting
>  
> As agreed on our CABF teleconference last week, we are starting the formal 
> discussion period for Ballot 190 (in this case, v8).  I have attached the 
> ballot in two formats and in three modes.
>  
> The title of the actual ballot to be voted on uses all capital letters 
> “BALLOT 190 v8 (9-5-2017)”.  I also attach a version that includes some 
> explanatory comments, and a “clean” version showing how the BRs will read if 
> Ballot 190 v8 is adopted “Ballot 190 v8 (9-5-2017) (showing BRs if adopted)”.
>  
> The discussion period ends Sept. 12 at 18:00 UTC, and the voting period runs 
> Sept. 12-19.
>  
> This version 8 is based on the prior version 7, but includes a limited number 
> of changes as outlined in emails among me, Ryan, and Doug on Aug. 29-30. 
>  
> We are almost there!  Thanks to everyone who has worked on this effort over 
> the past two years.  Assuming Ballot 190 passes, the Validation Working Group 
> can then start work on further amendments as outlined in my prior emails.
>  
> <BALLOT 190 v8 (9-5-2017).docx><BALLOT 190 v8 (9-5-2017).pdf><Ballot 190 v8 
> (9-5-2017) with comments.docx><Ballot 190 v8 (9-5-2017) with 
> comments.pdf><Ballot 190 v8 (9-5-2017) (showing BRs if adopted).docx><Ballot 
> 190 v8 (9-5-2017) (showing BRs if 
> adopted).pdf>_______________________________________________
> Public mailing list
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public 
> <https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public>
> _______________________________________________
> Public mailing list
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public 
> <https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public>
_______________________________________________
Public mailing list
[email protected]
https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public

Reply via email to