Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. votes “Yes”

    Li-Chun Chen


-----Original message-----
From:Peter Miškovič via Public<[email protected]>
To:'Kirk Hall'<[email protected]>,'CA/Browser Forum Public 
Discussion List'<[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 23:00:30
Subject: [外部郵件] Re: [cabfpub] Voting has started on Ballot 190
Disig votes „YES“.
 
Regards
Peter Miskovic
 
From: Public [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Kirk Hall via 
Public
Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2017 12:23 AM
To: CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List <[email protected]>
Subject: [cabfpub] Voting has started on Ballot 190

 
Voting has started on Ballot 190 as proposed on Sept 5 (see bottom of this 
message, and attachments), as amended by my email from Sept. 11 (see 
immediately below).  Voting runs through Sept. 19 at 18:00 UTC.
 
Entrust votes yes.
 
From: Public [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Kirk Hall via 
Public
Sent: Monday, September 11, 2017 6:01 AM
To: CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List <[email protected]>
Subject: [EXTERNAL][cabfpub] Two amendments to Ballot 190

 
The proposer and endorsers are making two minor amendments to Ballot 190 as 
follows.
 
1) In BR 3.2.2.4.6 "Agreed-Upon Change to Website", the current draft Version 8 
still has the typo "Request Value" that crept in sometime around BR 1.4. It 
should be "Random Value". Accordingly, BR 3.2.2.4.6 in Ballot 190 is changed to 
read as follows:
 
3.2.2.4.6 Agreed-Upon Change to Website
 
Confirming the Applicant's control over the FQDN by confirming one of the 
following under the "/.well-known/pki-validation" directory, or another path 
registered with IANA for the purpose of Domain Validation, on the Authorization 
Domain Name that is accessible by the CA via HTTP/HTTPS over an Authorized Port:
 
1.      The presence of Required Website Content contained in the content of a 
file. The entire Required Website Content MUST NOT appear in the request used 
to retrieve the file or web page, or
 
2.      The presence of the Request Token orRequest Random Value contained in 
the content of a file where the Request Token or Random Value MUST NOT appear 
in the request. ***
 
2) In Version 8 of BR 3.2.2.4.7, "DNS Change", the current language says:
 
"Confirming the Applicant's control over the FQDN by confirming the presence of 
a Random Value or Request Tokenfor either in a DNS CNAME, TXT or CAA record for 
either 1) an Authorization Domain Name; or 2) an Authorization Domain Name that 
is prefixed with a label that begins with an underscore character." 
 
Note that "for either" appears twice in the sentence, and we think the first 
occurrence should be deleted. Accordingly, BR 3.2.2.4.7 in Ballot 190 is 
changed to read as follows:
 
3.2.2.4.7  DNS Change
Confirming the Applicant's control over the FQDN by confirming the presence of 
a Random Value or Request Tokenfor either in a DNS CNAME, TXT or CAA record for 
either 1) an Authorization Domain Name; or 2) an Authorization Domain Name that 
is prefixed with a label that begins with an underscore character.
 
Voting on Ballot 190 will begin tomorrow, and the text has been changed as 
shown above.
***
From: Public [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Kirk Hall via 
Public
Sent: Tuesday, September 5, 2017 10:52 AM
To: CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List <[email protected]>
Subject: [EXTERNAL][cabfpub] Ballot 190 - Discussion Period is starting
 
As agreed on our CABF teleconference last week, we are starting the formal 
discussion period for Ballot 190 (in this case, v8).  I have attached the 
ballot in two formats and in three modes.
 
The title of the actual ballot to be voted on uses all capital letters “BALLOT 
190 v8 (9-5-2017)”.  I also attach a version that includes some explanatory 
comments, and a “clean” version showing how the BRs will read if Ballot 190 v8 
is adopted “Ballot 190 v8 (9-5-2017) (showing BRs if adopted)”.
 
The discussion period ends Sept. 12 at 18:00 UTC, and the voting period runs 
Sept. 12-19.
 
This version 8 is based on the prior version 7, but includes a limited number 
of changes as outlined in emails among me, Ryan, and Doug on Aug. 29-30. 
 
We are almost there!  Thanks to everyone who has worked on this effort over the 
past two years.  Assuming Ballot 190 passes, the Validation Working Group can 
then start work on further amendments as outlined in my prior emails.
 

_______________________________________________
Public mailing list
[email protected]
https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public




本信件可能包含中華電信股份有限公司機密資訊,非指定之收件者,請勿蒐集、處理或利用本信件內容,並請銷毀此信件. 
如為指定收件者,應確實保護郵件中本公司之營業機密及個人資料,不得任意傳佈或揭露,並應自行確認本郵件之附檔與超連結之安全性,以共同善盡資訊安全與個資保護責任. 
Please be advised that this email message (including any attachments) contains 
confidential information and may be legally privileged. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please destroy this message and all attachments from your 
system and do not further collect, process, or use them. Chunghwa Telecom and 
all its subsidiaries and associated companies shall not be liable for the 
improper or incomplete transmission of the information contained in this email 
nor for any delay in its receipt or damage to your system. If you are the 
intended recipient, please protect the confidential and/or personal information 
contained in this email with due care. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or 
distribution of this message in whole or in part is strictly prohibited. Also, 
please self-inspect attachments and hyperlinks contained in this email to 
ensure the information security and to protect personal information.


_______________________________________________
Public mailing list
[email protected]
https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public

Reply via email to