On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 7:56 AM, Tim Hollebeek <[email protected]> wrote:
> > What are we going to do about continuity of existing working groups (old > terminology, not new)? Is it necessary for the Server Certificate Working > Group Charter to say anything about sub-working groups (I wish we hadn't > used the existing term "working group" to mean something new, it is going > to be very confusing). > > Section 5.3.4 states that "legacy" working groups can be terminated immediately or must be rechartered within 6 months. There is no such thing as a "sub-working group" under the new bylaws. I think this means that there is no mechanism for an existing WG like Validation or Network Security to bring a proposal to the Server Certificate WG for discussion and voting?
_______________________________________________ Public mailing list [email protected] https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
