Yes, that last part is what I’m concerned about. We said they need to be re-chartered within 6 months, but I think we dropped the ball on including a mechanism to do so.
-Tim From: Wayne Thayer [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2018 9:32 AM To: Tim Hollebeek <[email protected]> Cc: CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [cabfpub] Pre-Ballot 206 - Amendment to IPR Policy & Bylaws re Working Group Formation On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 7:56 AM, Tim Hollebeek <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote: What are we going to do about continuity of existing working groups (old terminology, not new)? Is it necessary for the Server Certificate Working Group Charter to say anything about sub-working groups (I wish we hadn't used the existing term "working group" to mean something new, it is going to be very confusing). Section 5.3.4 states that "legacy" working groups can be terminated immediately or must be rechartered within 6 months. There is no such thing as a "sub-working group" under the new bylaws. I think this means that there is no mechanism for an existing WG like Validation or Network Security to bring a proposal to the Server Certificate WG for discussion and voting?
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Public mailing list [email protected] https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
