We're interpreting the bylaws as requiring the Chair to invite Interested Parties to attend WG teleconferences, correct? If the reason for this only applies to F2F Meetings as Dean suggests, then I suggest that we update the new bylaws to allow Interested Parties to attend WG teleconferences without an invitation.
Wayne On Sat, Feb 3, 2018 at 6:28 AM, Gervase Markham via Public < [email protected]> wrote: > On 03/02/18 02:49, Kirk Hall via Public wrote: > > I previously agreed with Wayne that an all-day VWG meeting in Herndon, > > VA on Tuesday, March 6 is a good idea – but we will have to push other > > WG meetings to later, maybe Wednesday morning. *_Does anyone object to > > this plan?_* > > Not at all. In the last meeting, we had spare time at the end of the > second day anyway. > > > On the question of attendance (in person or by phone) by Interested > > Parties at the special VWG meeting – I have pasted in the relevant part > > of Bylaw 3.2 below. If you had asked me what I thought it meant, I > > would have said “IPs can only come to the full Forum meetings at the > > invitation of the Chair, but they can come to Working Group meetings > > (teleconferences and face-to-face meetings) without an invitation from > > the Chair – it’s at their option.” > > I would read this as the variant expressed by others - "Forum Meetings" > includes all aspects of the meeting (because any part could become > overcrowded), and so clause c) trumps clause a) for WG meetings during > Forum Meetings, and so you need to explicitly invite people. But I hope > that task will not be too onerous :-) > > Gerv > _______________________________________________ > Public mailing list > [email protected] > https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public >
_______________________________________________ Public mailing list [email protected] https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
