How many interested parties are there currently on this forum? -----Original Message----- From: Public [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Gervase Markham via Public Sent: 03 February 2018 13:29 To: Kirk Hall <[email protected]>; CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [cabfpub] Attendance of Interested Parties at Working Group meetings
On 03/02/18 02:49, Kirk Hall via Public wrote: > I previously agreed with Wayne that an all-day VWG meeting in Herndon, > VA on Tuesday, March 6 is a good idea – but we will have to push other > WG meetings to later, maybe Wednesday morning. *_Does anyone object > to this plan?_* Not at all. In the last meeting, we had spare time at the end of the second day anyway. > On the question of attendance (in person or by phone) by Interested > Parties at the special VWG meeting – I have pasted in the relevant > part of Bylaw 3.2 below. If you had asked me what I thought it meant, > I would have said “IPs can only come to the full Forum meetings at the > invitation of the Chair, but they can come to Working Group meetings > (teleconferences and face-to-face meetings) without an invitation from > the Chair – it’s at their option.” I would read this as the variant expressed by others - "Forum Meetings" includes all aspects of the meeting (because any part could become overcrowded), and so clause c) trumps clause a) for WG meetings during Forum Meetings, and so you need to explicitly invite people. But I hope that task will not be too onerous :-) Gerv _______________________________________________ Public mailing list [email protected] https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Public mailing list [email protected] https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
