Not sure if it matters a great deal, but the reference to WebTrust for CA 
should be version 2.1, not 2.0.

Jeff Ward, CPA, CGMA, CITP, CISA, CISSP, CEH
Office Managing Partner & National Leader Third Party Attestation 
(SOC/WebTrust/Cybersecurity)
314-889-1220 (Direct)    347-1220 (Internal)
314-889-1221 (Fax)
jw...@bdo.com<mailto:jw...@bdo.com>

BDO
101 S Hanley Rd, Suite 800
St. Louis, MO 63105
UNITED STATES
314-889-1100
www.bdo.com<http://www.bdo.com>

Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
From: Public [mailto:public-boun...@cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Ryan Sleevi via 
Public
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2018 9:21 AM
To: Dimitris Zacharopoulos <ji...@it.auth.gr>; CA/Browser Forum Public 
Discussion List <public@cabforum.org>
Subject: Re: [cabfpub] Ballot proposal - Update Section 8.4 for CA audit 
criteria

Attention: This email was sent from someone outside of BDO USA. Always use 
caution when opening attachments or clicking links from unknown senders or when 
receiving unexpected emails.


On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 2:18 AM, Dimitris Zacharopoulos via Public 
<public@cabforum.org<mailto:public@cabforum.org>> wrote:

I am looking for two endorsers for the following ballot.

Dimitris.

Ballot XXX - Update Section 8.4 for CA audit criteria

The following motion has been proposed by Dimitris Zacharopoulos of HARICA and 
endorsed by ___ and ___

Background:

Section 8.4 of the Baseline Requirements describes the audit criteria for CAs 
that issue Publicly-Trusted SSL/TLS Certificates. This ballot attempts to 
achieve two things:

  1.  Remove the old ETSI TS documents

2.     Align the 
WebTrust<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cabforum.org%2Fwiki%2FWebTrust&data=02%7C01%7Cjward%40bdo.com%7Cefc0815200a54f92dbf908d5a3a571a5%7C6e57fc1a413e405091da7d2dc8543e3c%7C0%7C0%7C636594853327607164&sdata=8xxyL5y4ru1ryYPo35ybbZcRfoYyoFJqbSNpNNqgDZE%3D&reserved=0>
 and ETSI requirements

"WebTrust<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cabforum.org%2Fwiki%2FWebTrust&data=02%7C01%7Cjward%40bdo.com%7Cefc0815200a54f92dbf908d5a3a571a5%7C6e57fc1a413e405091da7d2dc8543e3c%7C0%7C0%7C636594853327607164&sdata=8xxyL5y4ru1ryYPo35ybbZcRfoYyoFJqbSNpNNqgDZE%3D&reserved=0>
 for Certification Authorities" is equivalent to "ETSI EN 319 401" and 
"WebTrust<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cabforum.org%2Fwiki%2FWebTrust&data=02%7C01%7Cjward%40bdo.com%7Cefc0815200a54f92dbf908d5a3a571a5%7C6e57fc1a413e405091da7d2dc8543e3c%7C0%7C0%7C636594853327607164&sdata=8xxyL5y4ru1ryYPo35ybbZcRfoYyoFJqbSNpNNqgDZE%3D&reserved=0>
 Principles and Criteria for Certification Authorities – SSL Baseline with 
Network Security" is the equivalent of "ETSI EN 319 411-1".

-- MOTION BEGINS --

Replace the first two numbered items in section 8.4 of the Baseline 
Requirements from:

1.     
WebTrust<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cabforum.org%2Fwiki%2FWebTrust&data=02%7C01%7Cjward%40bdo.com%7Cefc0815200a54f92dbf908d5a3a571a5%7C6e57fc1a413e405091da7d2dc8543e3c%7C0%7C0%7C636594853327607164&sdata=8xxyL5y4ru1ryYPo35ybbZcRfoYyoFJqbSNpNNqgDZE%3D&reserved=0>
 for Certification Authorities v2.0;

  1.  A national scheme that audits conformance to ETSI TS 102 042 / ETSI EN 
319 411-1; or

to:

1.     
WebTrust<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cabforum.org%2Fwiki%2FWebTrust&data=02%7C01%7Cjward%40bdo.com%7Cefc0815200a54f92dbf908d5a3a571a5%7C6e57fc1a413e405091da7d2dc8543e3c%7C0%7C0%7C636594853327763420&sdata=nF1OV4mtZ2VQF6ucGxisGOgndqhfDJYULFK4ZGNpOr4%3D&reserved=0>
 Principles and Criteria for Certification Authorities – SSL Baseline with 
Network Security;

  1.  A national scheme that audits conformance to ETSI EN 319 411-1; or

As noted several times that this has come up in the past, your proposed change 
to #1 is meaningfully and substantially different than what is currently 
required. You are proposing *changing* the audit scheme to a more restrictive 
set. That's something in the past that browsers have objected to, and for good 
reason.


BDO USA, LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership, is the U.S. member of 
BDO International Limited, a UK company limited by guarantee, and forms part of 
the international BDO network of independent member firms.

BDO is the brand name for the BDO network and for each of the BDO Member Firms.

IMPORTANT NOTICES

The contents of this email and any attachments to it may contain privileged and 
confidential information from BDO USA, LLP. This information is only for the 
viewing or use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended 
recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution 
or use of, or the taking of any action in reliance upon, the information 
contained in this e-mail, or any of the attachments to this e-mail, is strictly 
prohibited and that this e-mail and all of the attachments to this e-mail, if 
any, must be immediately returned to BDO USA, LLP or destroyed and, in either 
case, this e-mail and all attachments to this e-mail must be immediately 
deleted from your computer without making any copies hereof. If you have 
received this e-mail in error, please notify BDO USA, LLP by e-mail immediately.

_______________________________________________
Public mailing list
Public@cabforum.org
https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public

Reply via email to