Mozilla votes yes on ballot 223 v2. On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 9:49 PM Dimitris Zacharopoulos via Public < [email protected]> wrote:
> The following motion has been proposed by Dimitris Zacharopoulos of HARICA > and endorsed by Moudrick M. Dadashov of SSC and Tim Hollebeek from > Digicert. > > *Background*: > > Section 8.4 of the Baseline Requirements describes the audit criteria for > CAs that issue Publicly-Trusted SSL/TLS Certificates. This ballot attempts > to achieve two things: > > 1. Remove the old ETSI TS documents > 2. > > Align the WebTrust and ETSI requirements > > "WebTrust for Certification Authorities" is equivalent to "ETSI EN 319 > 401" and "WebTrust Principles and Criteria for Certification Authorities > – SSL Baseline with Network Security" combined with "WebTrust for > Certification Authorities" is equivalent to "ETSI EN 319 411-1". > > *-- MOTION BEGINS --* > > Replace the first two numbered items in section 8.4 from: > > 1. > > WebTrust for Certification Authorities v2.0; > 2. A national scheme that audits conformance to ETSI TS 102 042 / ETSI > EN 319 411-1; or > > to: > > 1. > > "WebTrust for CAs v2.0 or newer" AND "WebTrust for CAs SSL Baseline > with Network Security v2.2 or newer"; or > 2. ETSI EN 319 411-1, which includes normative references to ETSI EN > 319 401 (the latest version of the referenced ETSI documents should be > applied); or > > *-- MOTION ENDS --* > > The procedure for this ballot is as follows (exact start and end times may > be adjusted to comply with applicable Bylaws and IPR Agreement): > > *BALLOT 223 v2 Status: Update BR Section 8.4 for CA audit criteria* > > *Start time (22:00 UTC)* > > *End time (22:00 UTC)* > > Discussion (7+ days) > > 30 April 2018 > > 7 May 2018 > > Vote for approval (7 days) > > 8 May 2018 > > 15 May 2018 > > If vote approves ballot: Review Period (Chair to send Review Notice) (30 > days) > If Exclusion Notice(s) filed, ballot approval is rescinded and PAG to be > created. > If no Exclusion Notices filed, ballot becomes effective at end of Review > Period. > Votes must be cast by posting an on-list reply to this thread on the > Public Mail List. > > Upon filing of Review Notice by Chair > > 30 days after filing of Review Notice by Chair > > From the Bylaws section 2.4(a): "If the Draft Guideline Ballot is > proposing a Final Maintenance Guideline, such ballot will include a redline > or comparison showing the set of changes from the Final Guideline > section(s) intended to become a Final Maintenance Guideline, and need not > include a copy of the full set of guidelines. Such redline or comparison > shall be made against the Final Guideline section(s) as they exist at the > time a ballot is proposed, and need not take into consideration other > ballots that may be proposed subsequently, except as provided in Section > 2.4(j) below". > > Votes must be cast by posting an on-list reply to this thread on the > Public list. A vote in favor of the motion must indicate a clear 'yes' in > the response. A vote against must indicate a clear 'no' in the response. A > vote to abstain must indicate a clear 'abstain' in the response. Unclear > responses will not be counted. The latest vote received from any > representative of a voting member before the close of the voting period > will be counted. Voting members are listed here: > https://cabforum.org/members/ > In order for the motion to be adopted, two thirds or more of the votes > cast by members in the CA category and greater than 50% of the votes cast > by members in the browser category must be in favor. Quorum is shown on > CA/Browser Forum wiki. Under the Bylaws section 2.3(g), at least the > required quorum number must participate in the ballot for the ballot to be > valid, either by voting in favor, voting against, or abstaining. > _______________________________________________ > Public mailing list > [email protected] > https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public >
_______________________________________________ Public mailing list [email protected] https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
