Apple votes YES on ballot 223 v2.

Curt

> On May 7, 2018, at 2:48 PM, Dimitris Zacharopoulos via Public 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> The following motion has been proposed by Dimitris Zacharopoulos of HARICA 
> and endorsed by Moudrick M. Dadashov of SSC and Tim Hollebeek from Digicert.
> Background:
> 
> Section 8.4 of the Baseline Requirements describes the audit criteria for CAs 
> that issue Publicly-Trusted SSL/TLS Certificates. This ballot attempts to 
> achieve two things:
> 
> Remove the old ETSI TS documents
> Align the WebTrust and ETSI requirements
> 
> "WebTrust for Certification Authorities" is equivalent to "ETSI EN 319 401" 
> and "WebTrust Principles and Criteria for Certification Authorities – SSL 
> Baseline with Network Security" combined with "WebTrust for Certification 
> Authorities" is equivalent to "ETSI EN 319 411-1".
> 
> -- MOTION BEGINS --
> 
> Replace the first two numbered items in section 8.4 from:
> 
> WebTrust for Certification Authorities v2.0;
> 
> A national scheme that audits conformance to ETSI TS 102 042 / ETSI EN 319 
> 411-1; or
> to:
> 
> "WebTrust for CAs v2.0 or newer" AND "WebTrust for CAs SSL Baseline with 
> Network Security v2.2 or newer"; or 
> 
> ETSI EN 319 411-1, which includes normative references to ETSI EN 319 401 
> (the latest version of the referenced ETSI documents should be applied); or
> -- MOTION ENDS --
> 
> The procedure for this ballot is as follows (exact start and end times may be 
> adjusted to comply with applicable Bylaws and IPR Agreement):
> 
> BALLOT 223 v2 Status: Update BR Section 8.4 for CA audit criteria
> 
> Start time (22:00 UTC)
> 
> End time (22:00 UTC)
> 
> Discussion (7+ days)
> 
> 30 April 2018
> 
> 7 May 2018
> 
> Vote for approval (7 days)
> 
> 8 May 2018
> 15 May 2018
> If vote approves ballot: Review Period (Chair to send Review Notice) (30 days)
> If Exclusion Notice(s) filed, ballot approval is rescinded and PAG to be 
> created.
> If no Exclusion Notices filed, ballot becomes effective at end of Review 
> Period.
> Votes must be cast by posting an on-list reply to this thread on the Public 
> Mail List.
> 
> Upon filing of Review Notice by Chair
> 
> 30 days after filing of Review Notice by Chair
> 
> From the Bylaws section 2.4(a): "If the Draft Guideline Ballot is proposing a 
> Final Maintenance Guideline, such ballot will include a redline or comparison 
> showing the set of changes from the Final Guideline section(s) intended to 
> become a Final Maintenance Guideline, and need not include a copy of the full 
> set of guidelines. Such redline or comparison shall be made against the Final 
> Guideline section(s) as they exist at the time a ballot is proposed, and need 
> not take into consideration other ballots that may be proposed subsequently, 
> except as provided in Section 2.4(j) below".
> 
> Votes must be cast by posting an on-list reply to this thread on the Public 
> list. A vote in favor of the motion must indicate a clear 'yes' in the 
> response. A vote against must indicate a clear 'no' in the response. A vote 
> to abstain must indicate a clear 'abstain' in the response. Unclear responses 
> will not be counted. The latest vote received from any representative of a 
> voting member before the close of the voting period will be counted. Voting 
> members are listed here: https://cabforum.org/members/ 
> <https://cabforum.org/members/>In order for the motion to be adopted, two 
> thirds or more of the votes cast by members in the CA category and greater 
> than 50% of the votes cast by members in the browser category must be in 
> favor. Quorum is shown on CA/Browser Forum wiki. Under the Bylaws section 
> 2.3(g), at least the required quorum number must participate in the ballot 
> for the ballot to be valid, either by voting in favor, voting against, or 
> abstaining.
> <CA-Browser Forum BR 1.5.7-ballot 223v2 
> redline.pdf>_______________________________________________
> Public mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public

_______________________________________________
Public mailing list
[email protected]
https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public

Reply via email to