On 18/5/2018 1:39 πμ, Tim Hollebeek via Public wrote:
(1) Certificate Issuer: The member organization operates a
certification authority that has a current and successful WebTrust for
CAs audit, or ETSI TS 102042, ETSI 101456, or ETSI EN 319 411-1 audit
report prepared by a properly-qualified auditor, and that actively
issues email certificates, such certificates being treated as valid
when verified by software from a Certificate Consumer Member.
Applicants that are not actively issuing certificates but otherwise
meet membership criteria 7 may be granted Associate Member status
under Bylaw Sec. 3.1 for a period of time to be designated by the Forum.
(2) Root Certificate Issuer: The member organization operates a
certification authority that has a current and successful WebTrust for
CAs, or ETSI TS 102042, ETSI TS 101456, ETSI EN 319 411-1 audit report
prepared by a properly-qualified auditor, and that actively issues
email certificates to subordinate CAs that, in turn, actively issue
email certificates, such certificates being treated as valid when
verified by software from a Certificate Consumer Member. Applicants
that are not actively issuing certificates but otherwise meet
membership criteria may be granted Associate Member status under Bylaw
Sec. 3.1 for a period of time to be designated by the Forum.
Shall we replace "ETSI TS 102042, ETSI TS 101456, ETSI EN 319 411-1"
with "ETSI EN 319 411-1 (LCP, NCP, NCP+) or ETSI EN 319 411-2 (QCP-l,
QCP-l-qscd, QCP-n, QCP-n-qscd)"?
I added 411-2 because there might be TSPs that only have 411-2 listed in
their Conformance Assessment Report.
Thanks,
Dimitris.
_______________________________________________
Public mailing list
[email protected]
https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
