Yeah, thanks for digging that up. I think it was a different reference I was thinking of, but same conclusion. Making things complicated makes things fail.
-Tim > -----Original Message----- > From: Seth David Schoen <[email protected]> > Sent: Wednesday, August 8, 2018 4:46 PM > To: Ryan Sleevi <[email protected]>; CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion > List <[email protected]> > Cc: Tim Hollebeek <[email protected]>; servercert- > [email protected] > Subject: Re: [cabfpub] [Servercert-wg] Ballot SC4 - email and CAA CONTACT > > Ryan Sleevi via Public writes: > > > On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 6:38 PM Tim Hollebeek > > <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > If certificates need to be readily available to everyone, we can’t > > > force arcana onto less sophisticated users. Remember, there’s > > > plenty of evidence showing that people adding CAA records often misspell > letsencrypt. > > > > > > > Link? > > I have no position on the underlying issue, but this is probably a reference > to > this research paper: > > https://www.net.in.tum.de/fileadmin/bibtex/publications/papers/caa_ccr.pdf > > (I also do a fair amount of support for Let's Encrypt users and can confirm > that > people on the Internet often misspell and/or misunderstand > things.) > > -- > Seth Schoen <[email protected]> > Senior Staff Technologist https://www.eff.org/ > Electronic Frontier Foundation https://www.eff.org/join > 815 Eddy Street, San Francisco, CA 94109 +1 415 436 9333 x107
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Public mailing list [email protected] https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
