On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 7:26 AM Tim Hollebeek <[email protected]> wrote:
> This is correct. The ballot requirements for endorsers and discussion > periods applies to _*all*_ ballots. The bylaws are pretty clear on that; > it’s even in the title of section 2.3. > > > > The fact that 4.1(c) of the bylaws requires a ballot does not override the > usual ballot rules. > > > > I really hate to nitpick about things like this, but I felt I had to point > it out. > > > > Also if we could get a second endorser to fix the voting rules after > Ballot 216 got accidentally overwritten, that’d be great. I can write up > the ballot over the weekend. > > > My understanding is that Ben is working on a bylaws fixup ballot, including the addition of the discussion period improvements from ballot 206. Regardless of who creates that ballot, I would be happy to endorse.
_______________________________________________ Public mailing list [email protected] https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
