It has been pointed out that the Network Security Working Group sunsetted in 
June of this year by the terms of Ballot 203 which created the WG.  So I am 
removing the NetSec WG from this ballot SC9, which I am amending to convert 
only the Validation Working Group of the Forum to become the Validation 
Subcommittee of the SCWG according to the terms of Bylaw 5.3.4 (see below).

Tim – you endorsed the earlier version of this ballot – will you endorse this 
Version 2?  Do we have another endorser?

I would like to complete the discussion and voting on this ballot by October 3.


Ballot SC9 v2 – Conversion of CABF Validation Working Group to SCWG Validation 
Subcommittee

Purpose of Ballot:

All Working Groups of the Forum will expire on October 3, 2018.  Bylaws 
Sections 5.3.1(e) and 5.3.4 allow any “Legacy” Working Groups (“LWG”) in 
existence when Bylaws v.1.9 was approved by the Forum to be converted to a 
Subcommittee of a Chartered Working Group pursuant to the procedures of Bylaws 
Section 5.3.1(e).

The Server Certificate Working Group wishes to convert the existing Validation 
Working Group of the Forum into a Subcommittee of the Server Certificate 
Working Group.

--- MOTION BEGINS ---

In accordance with Bylaws 5.3.1(e) and 5.3.4, the Server Certificate Working 
Group (SCWG) hereby converts the Validation Working Group of the CA/Browser 
Forum to the Validation Subcommittee of the Server Certificate Working Group, 
effective upon approval of this ballot.  Tim Hollebeek shall become the initial 
Chair of the Validation Subcommittee.  There shall be no expiry date for this 
Subcommittee.


--- MOTION ENDS ---

The procedure for approval of this ballot is as follows:

Discussion (7 days)
Start Time: 2018-09-xx, 7:00 am Eastern Time
End Time: 2018-09-xx, 7:00 am Eastern Time

Vote for approval (7 days)
Start Time: 2018-09-xx, 7:00 am Eastern Time
End Time: 2018-09-xx, 7:00 am Eastern Time

***
Additional Information

Ballot 143 – Formalization of Validation Working Group (approved Feb 2015)
https://www.cabforum.org/wiki/143%20-%20Formalization%20of%20validation%20working%20group


The CA-Browser Forum formally establishes the Validation Working Group as an 
official working group of the CAB Forum, replacing the previous informal EV 
working group. The scope of this working group is to address issues arising 
under adopted CAB Forum standards related to the validation of certificate 
information and the inclusion of information in certificates.



Scope: The Validation Working Group will consider all matters relating to the 
validation and inclusion of information in certificates under adopted CAB Forum 
guidelines.



Deliverables: The Working Group shall produce one or more documents offering 
options to the Forum for validation within the scope defined above.



Bylaws v1.9

5.3.1 Formation of Chartered Working Groups
(e) CWGs may establish any number of subcommittees within its own Working Group 
to address any of such CWG’s business (each, a “Subcommittee”). A CWG-created 
Subcommittee needs to be approved by the CWG itself according to the approval 
process set forth in the CWG charter, but approval of the Forum is not 
necessary. Subcommittees must exist under an approved CWG.

5.3.4 Legacy Working Groups
Any “Legacy” Working Groups (“LWG”) in existence when this Bylaws v.1.8 is 
approved by the Forum shall have the option of (a) converting to a Subcommittee 
under a CWG pursuant to Section 5.3.1(e), (b) immediately terminating, or (c) 
continuing in effect without change for 6 months following such approval. For 
an LWG to continue beyond such 6 months, it must have a charter approved as 
described in Section 5.3.1 above, as if it was a new Working Group.

_______________________________________________
Public mailing list
[email protected]
https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public

Reply via email to