Please see my comments regarding process and the establishment of Subcommittees. These concerns apply similarly to this proposal.
On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 5:10 PM Kirk Hall via Public <[email protected]> wrote: > It has been pointed out that the Network Security Working Group sunsetted > in June of this year by the terms of Ballot 203 which created the WG. So I > am removing the NetSec WG from this ballot SC9, which I am amending to > convert only the Validation Working Group of the Forum to become the > Validation Subcommittee of the SCWG according to the terms of Bylaw 5.3.4 > (see below). > > > > Tim – you endorsed the earlier version of this ballot – will you endorse > this Version 2? Do we have another endorser? > > > > I would like to complete the discussion and voting on this ballot by > October 3. > > > > > > *Ballot SC9 v2 – Conversion of CABF Validation Working Group to SCWG > Validation Subcommittee* > > > > *Purpose of Ballot: * > > > > All Working Groups of the Forum will expire on October 3, 2018. Bylaws > Sections 5.3.1(e) and 5.3.4 allow any “Legacy” Working Groups (“LWG”) in > existence when Bylaws v.1.9 was approved by the Forum to be converted to a > Subcommittee of a Chartered Working Group pursuant to the procedures of > Bylaws Section 5.3.1(e). > > > > The Server Certificate Working Group wishes to convert the existing > Validation Working Group of the Forum into a Subcommittee of the Server > Certificate Working Group. > > > > *--- MOTION BEGINS ---* > > > > In accordance with Bylaws 5.3.1(e) and 5.3.4, the Server Certificate > Working Group (SCWG) hereby converts the Validation Working Group of the > CA/Browser Forum to the Validation Subcommittee of the Server Certificate > Working Group, effective upon approval of this ballot. Tim Hollebeek shall > become the initial Chair of the Validation Subcommittee. There shall be no > expiry date for this Subcommittee. > > > > > > *--- MOTION ENDS ---* > > > > The procedure for approval of this ballot is as follows: > > > > Discussion (7 days) > > Start Time: 2018-09-xx, 7:00 am Eastern Time > > End Time: 2018-09-xx, 7:00 am Eastern Time > > > > Vote for approval (7 days) > > Start Time: 2018-09-xx, 7:00 am Eastern Time > > End Time: 2018-09-xx, 7:00 am Eastern Time > > > > *** > > Additional Information > > > > *Ballot 143 – Formalization of Validation Working Group (approved Feb > 2015)* > > > https://www.cabforum.org/wiki/143%20-%20Formalization%20of%20validation%20working%20group > > > > The CA-Browser Forum formally establishes the Validation Working Group as > an official working group of the CAB Forum, replacing the previous informal > EV working group. The scope of this working group is to address issues > arising under adopted CAB Forum standards related to the validation of > certificate information and the inclusion of information in certificates. > > > > Scope: The Validation Working Group will consider all matters relating to > the validation and inclusion of information in certificates under adopted > CAB Forum guidelines. > > > > Deliverables: The Working Group shall produce one or more documents > offering options to the Forum for validation within the scope defined above. > > > > > > *Bylaws v1.9* > > > > *5.3.1 Formation of Chartered Working Groups* > > (e) CWGs may establish any number of subcommittees within its own Working > Group to address any of such CWG’s business (each, a “Subcommittee”). A > CWG-created Subcommittee needs to be approved by the CWG itself according > to the approval process set forth in the CWG charter, but approval of the > Forum is not necessary. Subcommittees must exist under an approved CWG. > > > > *5.3.4 Legacy Working Groups* > > Any “Legacy” Working Groups (“LWG”) in existence when this Bylaws v.1.8 is > approved by the Forum shall have the option of (a) converting to a > Subcommittee under a CWG pursuant to Section 5.3.1(e), (b) immediately > terminating, or (c) continuing in effect without change for 6 months > following such approval. For an LWG to continue beyond such 6 months, it > must have a charter approved as described in Section 5.3.1 above, as if it > was a new Working Group. > > > _______________________________________________ > Public mailing list > [email protected] > https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public >
_______________________________________________ Public mailing list [email protected] https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
