Reversed, of course? Since the IPR agreement uses letters and the goal was to be able to use numbered lists.
5.3.1 Formation of Chartered Working Groups 1. [Referred to as 5.3.1(a) in the IPR agreement] Members who desire … 2. The charter shall … 3. … 4. … 5. [Referred to as 5.3.1(e) in the IPR agreement] CWGs may … -Tim From: Wayne Thayer <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2019 1:58 PM To: Kirk Hall <[email protected]> Cc: Tim Hollebeek <[email protected]>; CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [cabfpub] Bylaws 2.2 Pre-Ballot I prefer Kirk's suggestion. On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 1:39 PM Kirk Hall <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote: Another option is to keep with the regular Bylaws numbering, and include a reference to IPRA in parenthesis: 5.3.1(a) [Referred to as 5.3.1(1) in IPR Agreement ]: Blah blah From: Public <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > On Behalf Of Tim Hollebeek via Public Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2019 1:37 PM To: Wayne Thayer <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > Cc: CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > Subject: [EXTERNAL]Re: [cabfpub] Bylaws 2.2 Pre-Ballot I like it. -Tim From: Wayne Thayer <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2019 11:22 AM To: Tim Hollebeek <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > Cc: Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >; CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [cabfpub] Bylaws 2.2 Pre-Ballot I'd like to propose an alternative that facilitates markdown formatting and the change to numbers in section 5.3.1: Add the following to the end of section 5.3.1: (a) To resolve references to section 5.3.1(a), refer to section 5.3.1(1). (e) To resolve references to section 5.3.1(e), refer to section 5.3.1(5). Would this be acceptable? On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 10:30 AM Tim Hollebeek <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote: I would suggest that this means we need to stick to letters for 5.3.1 for now, and remember to avoid making the same mistake in the future. -Tim
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Public mailing list [email protected] https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
