Here is the proposed change: https://github.com/cabforum/documents/commit/4866f8f85665cb308f6d5429ad64797e1e9e8d37
On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 2:41 PM Kirk Hall <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, sorry > > > > *From:* Tim Hollebeek <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Thursday, April 25, 2019 2:36 PM > *To:* Wayne Thayer <[email protected]>; Kirk Hall < > [email protected]> > *Cc:* CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List <[email protected]> > *Subject:* [EXTERNAL]RE: [cabfpub] Bylaws 2.2 Pre-Ballot > > > > Reversed, of course? Since the IPR agreement uses letters and the goal > was to be able to use numbered lists. > > > > 5.3.1 Formation of Chartered Working Groups > > > > 1. [Referred to as 5.3.1(a) in the IPR agreement] > Members who desire … > 2. The charter shall … > 3. … > 4. … > 5. [Referred to as 5.3.1(e) in the IPR agreement] > CWGs may … > > > > -Tim > > > > *From:* Wayne Thayer <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Thursday, April 25, 2019 1:58 PM > *To:* Kirk Hall <[email protected]> > *Cc:* Tim Hollebeek <[email protected]>; CA/Browser Forum Public > Discussion List <[email protected]> > *Subject:* Re: [cabfpub] Bylaws 2.2 Pre-Ballot > > > > I prefer Kirk's suggestion. > > > > On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 1:39 PM Kirk Hall <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Another option is to keep with the regular Bylaws numbering, and include a > reference to IPRA in parenthesis: > > > > 5.3.1(a) [Referred to as 5.3.1(1) in IPR Agreement ]: Blah blah > > > > *From:* Public <[email protected]> *On Behalf Of *Tim Hollebeek > via Public > *Sent:* Thursday, April 25, 2019 1:37 PM > *To:* Wayne Thayer <[email protected]> > *Cc:* CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List <[email protected]> > *Subject:* [EXTERNAL]Re: [cabfpub] Bylaws 2.2 Pre-Ballot > > > > I like it. > > > > -Tim > > > > *From:* Wayne Thayer <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Thursday, April 25, 2019 11:22 AM > *To:* Tim Hollebeek <[email protected]> > *Cc:* Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) <[email protected]>; CA/Browser > Forum Public Discussion List <[email protected]> > *Subject:* Re: [cabfpub] Bylaws 2.2 Pre-Ballot > > > > I'd like to propose an alternative that facilitates markdown formatting > and the change to numbers in section 5.3.1: Add the following to the end of > section 5.3.1: > > > > (a) To resolve references to section 5.3.1(a), refer to section 5.3.1(1). > > > > (e) To resolve references to section 5.3.1(e), refer to section 5.3.1(5). > > > > Would this be acceptable? > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 10:30 AM Tim Hollebeek <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I would suggest that this means we need to stick to letters for 5.3.1 for > now, and remember to avoid making the same mistake in the future. > > > > -Tim > > > >
_______________________________________________ Public mailing list [email protected] https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
