I believe the immutable redline is https://github.com/cabforum/forum/compare/fa1a5cb37a452e53d769ed759c06f05d21b1cb4b..f197d28fac92c807896d55b6ef43b776b6264aca
I would suggest updating the overview section of the ballot to better explain what is meant by "re-election". Having said that, I would be happy to endorse. Thanks, Wayne On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 7:57 AM Tim Hollebeek via Public < [email protected]> wrote: > I should also mention that there are a few other election-related errors > in the Bylaws, but I think mixing policy issues and bugfixes in the same > ballot is bad practice. > > > > Willing to work on a separate ballot for those as well. > > > > -Tim > > > > *From:* Public <[email protected]> *On Behalf Of *Tim Hollebeek > via Public > *Sent:* Wednesday, July 20, 2022 10:53 AM > *To:* CABforum1 <[email protected]> > *Subject:* [cabfpub] Draft Ballot FORUM-18: Allow re-election of CWG > chairs and vice chairs > > > > *Thank you very much to Ben for the endorsement: > https://github.com/cabforum/forum/pull/27#issuecomment-1189406036 > <https://github.com/cabforum/forum/pull/27#issuecomment-1189406036>* > > > > *Looking for one more endorser, and I always forget how to do stable > github comparison URLs…* > > > > > > *Ballot FORUM-18, Allow Re-election of CWG Chairs and Vice Chairs* > > > > Proposed by Tim Hollebeek of DigiCert and endorsed by Ben Wilson of > Mozilla and ??? of ???. > > > > *Overview* > > The current Bylaws have been read by some to allow re-election of CWG > Chairs and Vice Chairs, and by others to prohibit it. It has happened once > in the past, and whether it is allowed depends on whether “follow the > procedures of Bylaws Section 4.1 as closely as possible” is merely > referring to election procedures, or also candidate qualifications. > > > > This ambiguity was discussed during the spring CA/Browser Forum > Face-to-face meeting, and the consensus was that we should update the > Bylaws to clarify that re-election is allowed, and the election process > itself is sufficient to determine whether members want to retain the > existing Chair and/or Vice Chair, or whether they want to vote for someone > else. This is important because the pool of qualified and willing > candidates is not particularly large. > > > > This ballot retains term limits at the Forum level. > > > > *— MOTION BEGINS —* > > > > The Bylaws of the CA/Browser Forum are amended as described in the > following redline: > > > > > https://github.com/cabforum/forum/compare/main...timfromdigicert-bylaws-reelection > > > > — MOTION ENDS — > > The procedure for approval of this ballot is as follows: > > Discussion (7+ days) > > Start Time: ??? > > End Time: ??? > > Vote for approval (7 days) > > Start Time: ??? > > End Time: ??? > > > _______________________________________________ > Public mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public >
_______________________________________________ Public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
