-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 <snip>
> wrt John's RSN, he merely point to the extant instances on a 'best > efforts' basis. Thank you, obo all interested parties, for your current > AUTH zone data, including your glue records. > > As far as suggesting that someone remove OpenNICs data from their > RSN/RSC, as a long time member of OpenNIC I can affirm that this is not > OpenNIC policy to request such isolaton from the Internet Community, nor > does it advance the mission of OpenNIC by painting itself into a corner > of exclusivity - the notion, concept and philosophy of OpenNIC, it's > membersship, and members of OpenNIC such as myself is that of Openness, > Inclusion, Democracy, and Cooperation. This is not what I am trying to do. We all have to work together. I have made a suggestion to the OpenNIC about starting to work closely with other active alt-roots. I hope the community takes my suggestion positively as this is the only way we will get somewhere, unite! > What you have suggested is exactly what the Alternate, Deprecated ICANN > Legacy root system wants you to do - remove their TLDs from the OpenNIC > rootzone. I have stated this as there is no formal peering arrangement yet, so its a one way street, which is un-fair on WorldRoot. > Not a very practical idea, and also one that can be extended to the > concept of search engines, although there are robots.txt files for > sensitive or private data in the name space, and also for the occasional > xenophobe. > > Our mission, as members of OpenNIC, IMNSHO (and part of the TLDA > Mission), is to seek inclusion of Inclusive Name Space content and data > in Google and the rest... - not exclusion from search engines or other > roots. See my comments above. My goal is to try and get the alt-roots to work together (hopefully) and provide the best DNS system we can. OpenNIC already has 10 public facing DNS resolvers out in the wild, geographically located. If we can work together, we would have a very robust infrastructure, but I can not speak on behalf of OpenNIC. Lets hope my suggestion to them hold ground. > In closing, I would also like to point out that there have only ever > been two (2) RSNs/RSCs that have held peering agreements with OpenNIC > anyway - Those would be AlterNIC, and my PacificRoot. And we know where those tow headed. The direction we don't wanna go. I'll keep in touch..... - -- Cheers, Julian De Marchi - -- OpenNIC user - http://www.opennicproject.org/ | http://www.opennic.glue Support OpenNIC, become a member today! - -- PGP 0x8D659814 - -- Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments. See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFKG0DdfM8nSo1lmBQRArKvAKCfRNUiKgaKmVQjJwMC3l0Ecs3kSwCg6SKC RzAZmbw4xNkgMnPmKhU65lU= =jrZL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Public mailing list [email protected] http://tldainc.org/mailman/listinfo/public_tldainc.org
