All fixed. My way.
Thanks or the heads up
John
----- Original Message -----
From: "Julian De Marchi" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, May 25, 2009 8:07 PM
Subject: Re: [Public] INFO: WorldRoot website cleanup complete
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
<snip>
wrt John's RSN, he merely point to the extant instances on a 'best
efforts' basis. Thank you, obo all interested parties, for your current
AUTH zone data, including your glue records.
As far as suggesting that someone remove OpenNICs data from their
RSN/RSC, as a long time member of OpenNIC I can affirm that this is not
OpenNIC policy to request such isolaton from the Internet Community, nor
does it advance the mission of OpenNIC by painting itself into a corner
of exclusivity - the notion, concept and philosophy of OpenNIC, it's
membersship, and members of OpenNIC such as myself is that of Openness,
Inclusion, Democracy, and Cooperation.
This is not what I am trying to do. We all have to work together. I
have made a suggestion to the OpenNIC about starting to work closely
with other active alt-roots. I hope the community takes my suggestion
positively as this is the only way we will get somewhere, unite!
What you have suggested is exactly what the Alternate, Deprecated ICANN
Legacy root system wants you to do - remove their TLDs from the OpenNIC
rootzone.
I have stated this as there is no formal peering arrangement yet, so
its a one way street, which is un-fair on WorldRoot.
Not a very practical idea, and also one that can be extended to the
concept of search engines, although there are robots.txt files for
sensitive or private data in the name space, and also for the occasional
xenophobe.
Our mission, as members of OpenNIC, IMNSHO (and part of the TLDA
Mission), is to seek inclusion of Inclusive Name Space content and data
in Google and the rest... - not exclusion from search engines or other
roots.
See my comments above. My goal is to try and get the alt-roots to work
together (hopefully) and provide the best DNS system we can. OpenNIC
already has 10 public facing DNS resolvers out in the wild,
geographically located. If we can work together, we would have a very
robust infrastructure, but I can not speak on behalf of OpenNIC. Lets
hope my suggestion to them hold ground.
In closing, I would also like to point out that there have only ever
been two (2) RSNs/RSCs that have held peering agreements with OpenNIC
anyway - Those would be AlterNIC, and my PacificRoot.
And we know where those tow headed. The direction we don't wanna go.
I'll keep in touch.....
- --
Cheers,
Julian De Marchi
- --
OpenNIC user - http://www.opennicproject.org/ | http://www.opennic.glue
Support OpenNIC, become a member today!
- --
PGP 0x8D659814
- --
Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments.
See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFKG0DdfM8nSo1lmBQRArKvAKCfRNUiKgaKmVQjJwMC3l0Ecs3kSwCg6SKC
RzAZmbw4xNkgMnPmKhU65lU=
=jrZL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Public mailing list
[email protected]
http://tldainc.org/mailman/listinfo/public_tldainc.org
_______________________________________________
Public mailing list
[email protected]
http://tldainc.org/mailman/listinfo/public_tldainc.org
