Hi Sandra

Thanks for pointing this out! And you are right, of course. That statement
is debatable.

The campaign is not ours and I don't necessarily agree with all of it. But
I think your message actually proves one important point that the campaign
tries to make: without harmonized copyright European citizens are uncertain
about what they can or cannot use.

And that's what is problematic from a perspective of free knowledge and
online collaboration. That's why I shared the link to the campaign on this
list. I am happy you are weighing in on this important topic.

Best,
Jan





On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 9:44 AM, Sandra Rientjes - Wikimedia Nederland <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Jan,
>
> Re. your statement: "It turns out that the original Dutch version is in
> the public domain in Poland -- but not in the Netherlands"
>
> This may be premature. It all depends on whether you accept the claim that 
> Otto
> Frank has copyright over  Anne Frank’s diary.
> As I stated on the communia-blog
> <http://www.communia-association.org/2016/04/25/anne-frank-term-copyright-protection-time-move-harmonisation-unification/>:
> that claim has not yet been upheld by any court and is considered invalid
> by several experts on the writings of Anne Frank.
>
> I am not sure whether this campaign - however sympathetic its cause -
> helps ensure that Anne Frank's diary remains firmly in the public domain,
> as it appears to take these claims for granted,
>
> Also: the text of the diary has been available from this (French?) website
> <http://affordance.typepad.com//mon_weblog/2016/01/anne-frank.html>since
> January 1.
>
>
> Sandra Rientjes
> Directeur/Executive Director Wikimedia Nederland
>
> tel.    (+31) (0)30 3200238
> mob. (+31) (0)6  31786379
>
> www.wikimedia.nl
>
> *Postadres*:
> * Bezoekadres:*
> Postbus 167                                                Mariaplaats 3
> 3500 AD  Utrecht                                         Utrecht
>
> 2016-04-26 17:21 GMT+02:00 L.Gelauff <[email protected]>:
>
>> Hi Jan,
>>
>> yes, this topic also had a lot of attention from Wikimedia Nederland
>> before (Although I believe we're not involved with this particular
>> project). I cc'd Sandra and Jos who are more involved with it.
>>
>> Best,
>> Lodewijk
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 5:07 PM, Jan Gerlach <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all
>>>
>>> Today WIPO celebrates World Intellectual Property Day
>>> <http://www.wipo.int/ip-outreach/en/ipday/> and I just wanted to bring
>>> to your attention a campaign by Communia, Kennisland, and Centrum Cyfrowe:
>>> the three organizations have been looking into the copyright status of Anne
>>> Frank's diary in Europe. It turns out that the original Dutch version is in
>>> the public domain in Poland -- but not in the Netherlands.
>>>
>>> Find more info about the #readannediary campaign that calls for shorter,
>>> harmonized copyright terms here
>>> <http://www.communia-association.org/2016/04/25/anne-frank-term-copyright-protection-time-move-harmonisation-unification/>
>>> .
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Jan
>>>
>>> ==
>>>
>>>
>>> Jan Gerlach
>>> Public Policy Manager
>>> Wikimedia Foundation
>>> 149 New Montgomery Street, 6th Floor
>>> San Francisco, CA 94105
>>> [email protected]
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Publicpolicy mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/publicpolicy
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Publicpolicy mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/publicpolicy
>
>
_______________________________________________
Publicpolicy mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/publicpolicy

Reply via email to