Whenever there'll be a discussion of the actual wording for FoP in EU, I'd say it'd be best if we explained why it is a very, very bad idea to include any such foggy clauses - this "natural environment", references to the 3-step test, the German-Czech exception, anything "fair", estimations by the amount of creativeness in a work, etc. The only positive effect of such clauses is they provide some emotional comfort to their supporters, while they also bring legal unclarity, court battles and repressed creative initiative for decades to come. Good laws are as clear and concise as possible.
Raul On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 12:58 PM, Dimitar Parvanov Dimitrov < [email protected]> wrote: > Yes, it is full FoP for architecture and sculpture. The only restriction > being that images should be permanent in public places and that they need > to be "in their natural environment". This exists also in Dutch law if I am > not mistaken. Not sure how to interpret it exactly - I guess you must > always see at least a little bit of background. > > Dimi > > 2016-05-12 11:54 GMT+02:00 <[email protected]>: > >> Hello, >> >> >> >> Can I get some more info on this (English presumably will be ok). Or just >> to shorten it, Is there a FoP for commercial use in Belgium being currently >> proposed? And will it be voted? >> >> >> >> Thanks >> >> >> >> Aktron >> >> >> >> ______________________________________________________________ >> > Od: Robin Pepermans <[email protected]> >> > Komu: Publicpolicy Group for Wikimedia < >> [email protected]> >> > Datum: 12.05.2016 09:29 >> > Předmět: Re: [Publicpolicy] Selfies at the Atomium soon legally >> > >> There will apparently be a second reading in committee on the request of >> PS (Parti Socialiste). No information on when that would be, but we'll >> contact MPs to try to find out. >> >> The media expects this bill to pass very easily though, given the >> cross-party political support. >> Regards >> SPQRobin >> >> 2016-05-11 15:59 GMT+02:00 Jan Gerlach <[email protected]>: >> >>> This is great, Romaine! >>> When would you expect the vote in Parliament? >>> Best, >>> Jan >>> >>> On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 7:31 PM, Romaine Wiki <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> "Selfies at the Atomium soon legally" >>>> was the title of an article of 11 May of De Redactie at: >>>> http://deredactie.be/cm/vrtnieuws/politiek/1.2652533 >>>> >>>> A quote translated: >>>> The Parliamentary Committee for Economy is almost finished with the >>>> introduction of the so-called "freedom of panorama". >>>> >>>> It seems the next step has been taken! >>>> Romaine >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Publicpolicy mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/publicpolicy >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Publicpolicy mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/publicpolicy >>> >> >> >> ---------- >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Publicpolicy mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/publicpolicy >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Publicpolicy mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/publicpolicy >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Publicpolicy mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/publicpolicy > >
_______________________________________________ Publicpolicy mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/publicpolicy
