Hi, Thanks for sharing the link. Contrary to the subject line, I get the impression that the court did not answer the question on the public domain (as in copyright) status of those harmonized standards that are referenced by EU law. It only answered a specific question on the EU access to documents law and left the second question unanswered. If someone had more time looking at the decision, I would be happy to see a clarification if I am mistaken.
Mathias On Tue, Mar 5, 2024 at 2:25 PM Federico Leva (Nemo) <[email protected]> wrote: > The CJEU today ruled for Carl Malamud against the European Commission in > C‑588/21 (Public.Resource.Org and Right to Know v. European Commission): > > > https://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?docid=283443&pageIndex=0&doclang=EN&mode=req&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=6375509 > > https://curia.europa.eu/jcms/jcms/p1_4324488/en/ > > I've therefore opened a discussion on Commons: > > > https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Village_pump/Copyright#Public_domain_status_of_European_harmonised_standards > > > https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:EN_301_549_V3.2.1_(2021-03).pdf > > Some relevant snippets from the ruling: > > «a harmonised standard, adopted on the basis of a directive [...] forms > part of EU law» > > «the rule of law, which requires free access to EU law for all natural > or legal persons of the European Union» > > «there is an overriding public interest [...] justifying the disclosure > of the requested harmonised standards» > > «As is apparent [...] the Commission should have acknowledged [...] the > existence of an overriding public interest» > > Best, > Federico > _______________________________________________ > Publicpolicy mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] >
_______________________________________________ Publicpolicy mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
