I think its too early to have an AFD, we should wait to see if any appeals or other responses take place. 14 days is not enough even for those involved in the case to consider its findings, there is no way we should be responding especially as the standards are PD in the USA.
On Tue, 5 Mar 2024 at 21:25, Federico Leva (Nemo) <[email protected]> wrote: > The CJEU today ruled for Carl Malamud against the European Commission in > C‑588/21 (Public.Resource.Org and Right to Know v. European Commission): > > > https://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?docid=283443&pageIndex=0&doclang=EN&mode=req&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=6375509 > > https://curia.europa.eu/jcms/jcms/p1_4324488/en/ > > I've therefore opened a discussion on Commons: > > > https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Village_pump/Copyright#Public_domain_status_of_European_harmonised_standards > > > https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:EN_301_549_V3.2.1_(2021-03).pdf > > Some relevant snippets from the ruling: > > «a harmonised standard, adopted on the basis of a directive [...] forms > part of EU law» > > «the rule of law, which requires free access to EU law for all natural > or legal persons of the European Union» > > «there is an overriding public interest [...] justifying the disclosure > of the requested harmonised standards» > > «As is apparent [...] the Commission should have acknowledged [...] the > existence of an overriding public interest» > > Best, > Federico > _______________________________________________ > Commons-l mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > -- Boodarwun Gnangarra 'ngany dabakarn koorliny arn boodjera dardon nlangan Nyungar koortabodjar'
_______________________________________________ Publicpolicy mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
