Dear free knowledge friends,

We're in the middle of a busy season and there's no shortage of policy
developments to share. Your (not comprehensive, definitely missing things)
recap below. Please note I'm out of office from *May 18 - July 13;* should
you need something from the WMF team during this time please contact the
right individual
<https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation/Legal/Global_Advocacy/About>or
our generic [email protected]. If you need something related to
this list, Dimi from WMEU is your guy!

*Submit a MozFest session?*

MozFest, the annual conference hosted by the Mozilla Foundation to
celebrate the open source community is now accepting proposals. The proposal
deadline
<https://appv2.sessionboard.com/submit/mozfest-2026/84f42512-cfc7-421a-9ded-00bfb65cf4d4>
is May 24th. The theme is "wilding": what happens when we loosen rigid
systems and create the conditions for communities and technologies to
evolve collectively, naturally, intuitively? Submissions should explore
what it means to let our digital worlds grow wilder, more diverse, and more
alive. It means community-owned mesh networks, federated platforms, open
protocols, community archives and tools built on transparency, trust and
mutual flourishing.

A little birdie shared that this year they want to make it feel like even
more of a festival, so a real focus on P&T demos, activations, and
installations of all kinds. That's where you all come in. I'm thinking
of @Richard
Knipel <[email protected]>'s event at the AI Impact Summit, @Lydia
Pintscher <[email protected]> anything WikiData related, and of
course, this fits beautifully with @Evelin Heidel <[email protected]> 's
work with the Climate Justice Working Group. If you're not sure where to
start, talk to @Sadik Shahadu <[email protected]> - he's had
multiple sessions accepted over the past few years.

*Update: Advocacy network programming*

Thank you to those who took the time to respond to our survey reviewing
WMF's advocacy programming, collaboration, and communications. There's a
few immediate changes we have lined-up, and a few sticky questions we'll be
digging into via focus groups after Wikimania. For now...

You said it’s not always clear where to find updates ➡️ We will centralize
updates more clearly through the policy mailing list and streamline where
key information is shared on Meta-Wiki. Details to be discussed in the
focus group.

You said quarterly advocacy calls and monthly internet governance calls are
the most useful formats, but timezones are hard ➡️ We will continue
investing in these calls and explore adding more regional and thematic
policy briefings. We will start rotating timezones for regular calls.

You said you want more opportunities for direct support from peers and
collaboration ➡️ We will continue building spaces for peer exchange and
relationship-building.

You said Day Zero workshops would benefit from more practical exercises ➡️ We
will incorporate more real-world scenarios and role-playing into future
workshops.
*Wikimania plans!*

The advocacy day zero workshop is live! Feel free to register by adding
your name to the event Meta-Wiki page
<https://wikimania.wikimedia.org/wiki/2026:Wikimania/Day_Zero_Advocacy_Workshop>.
This will run on Tuesday, *July 21,* 2026, in-person only, at the
conference venue, from *14:30 - 16:30*.  We've got some great stories to
share from the Wikimedia movement, including features from UN engagements,
copyright in Brazil and Nigeria, and more.

*What WMF has been up to...*

   1. 🎉 The Wikimedia Foundation is now an official member
   
<https://wikimediafoundation.org/news/2026/05/13/wikimedia-foundation-joins-the-digital-public-goods-alliance/>of
   the UN-endorsed Digital Public Goods Alliance. We've committed to
an advocacy
   initiative and a P&T initiative
   
<https://new.digitalpublicgoods.net/roadmap/9e4d7409-9cb0-4072-ae16-eaceedb8068b>
   as part of our membership. Practically, it will strengthen our
   relationships with important players and access to global fora where
   decisions are made about the future of the internet and the role of the
   open knowledge movement within that future. Please incorporate this into
   any external talking points! Here is some guidance
   
<https://docs.google.com/document/d/14XS-rJERlp6WCIwFBbvAXWUld1AJkcBSNSSMQ2xkoAA/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.fjgxhthb4mki>
   on how.
   2. Unblocking access to Wikipedia for editors in Indonesia. Overview of our
   work
   
<https://www.thejakartapost.com/business/2026/05/01/wikimedia-completes-indonesia-registration-under-threat-of-ban.html>;
   and you can put this in the broader context of DNS blocking as a tactic, as
   documented in this report from Article19
   
<https://www.article19.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/ARTICLE-19_DNS-Abuse_FINAL_30.04.26.pdf>
   .
   3. We participated in the stakeholder consultations leading up to the UN
   Global Dialogue on AI Governance
   <https://www.un.org/global-dialogue-ai-governance/en> this July in
   Geneva, in close coordination with Wikimedia Switzerland and Wikimedia
   Deutschland. You can see our written submission here
   
<https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:WMF_Submission_to_the_UN_Global_Dialogue_on_AI_Governance,_May_7_2026.pdf>.
   Amalia Toledo, our policy expert for Latin America, joined a related event
   hosted by the UN Office of the High Commissioner on Human Rights (OHCHR) to
   gather input from civil society and Global Majority stakeholders to inform
   the July 2026 Global Dialogue on AI Governance. Amalia’s takeaway: *We
   need to be very clear in our message and make a specific demand. AI cannot
   remain accurate or reliable if its extractive business practices deplete
   the people-governed digital ecosystems on which it depends. We must demand
   a governance model that ensures fair reuse, attribution, and direct support
   for the human infrastructure of digital public goods.*
   4. You can find a full recap of our April activities here
   
<https://diff.wikimedia.org/2026/04/05/dont-blink-protecting-the-wikimedia-model-its-people-and-its-values-in-february-2026/>
   .

*What Wikimedians and allies have been up to...*

*Awareness raising about Wikimedia's unique model and value in the age of
AI*

   - @Friederike von Franqué <[email protected]> from WMDE
   was on The Good Robot podcast, covering how feminist principles and
   decentralized infrastructure are transforming the internet from a corporate
   service into a public commons. Take a listen
   
<https://open.spotify.com/episode/0SBkOol7WJ5GiX3rNAe4re?si=4nKbrr3FSYOm44_dySP_NA>
   !
   - @Gonzalo Bazgan <[email protected]> from Argentina, @Regine
   Njiké <[email protected]> from Cameroon, and others have or are about
   to host informal information sharing events with local offices for the UN
   Department of Global Communications to help strengthen awareness of the
   important work Wikimedians do to strengthen information integrity.
   - @Daria Cybulska <[email protected]> @Sally Latham
   <[email protected]> from WMUK co-hosted a networking
   breakfast with me in London about *Information Integrity in the Age of
   AI.* Attendees included policy think tanks, children's rights
   organizations, academics, and publishers. These groups often talk to each
   other in 1:1 settings, but don't always have as wide of a network as
   Wikimedia groups do given our position as a platform operator, information
   broker, product owner, and civil society group all in one. Leaning into
   this convening power is something we can do in all countries.

*Better arguments and new friends to protect open source and the digital
commons?*

   - Our friends at Open Knowledge @Alek Tarkowski
<[email protected]> and @Aditya
   Singh <[email protected]> are consolidating a joint research
   initiative in which we've reviewed all responses to the European Open
   Digital Ecosystems consultation in order to identify new policy arguments
   we can adapt, and new partners we may want to work with to better advocate
   for protections for the digital commons. Relatedly, the European Commission
   has removed the Open Source Strategy from its latest indicative list of
   points to be discussed at the Commission meetings. We expect more
   information to be shared shortly about how/where this will be pursued
   instead.  Watch this space.
   - @Amalia Toledo <[email protected]> and @Renata Avila
   <[email protected]> are investigating what it means to understand
   and treat open knowledge as critical infrastructure
   
<https://medium.com/wikimedia-policy/knowledge-as-critical-digital-infrastructure-a-call-to-action-for-a-resilient-future-5e23968b170e>.
   This is the advocacy work we'll be pursuing through our DPGA membership.
   Here's exactly what we committed to
   
<https://new.digitalpublicgoods.net/roadmap/9e4d7409-9cb0-4072-ae16-eaceedb8068b>
   .

*Copyright*

   - On April 29th, many on this list were in Paris for the Exploratory
   Dialogue <https://openheritagestatement.org/dialogue> event that CC
   hosted at UNESCO to celebrate the Open Heritage Statement
   <https://openheritagestatement.org/>. This event was a masterclass in
   two things: (1) how to put on excellent panels that feature diverse
   perspectives and concrete case studies about why open knowledge matters;
   (2) clear, concise talking points about the value of open knowledge.
   Luckily, you can find many of those talking points here
   
<https://docs.google.com/document/d/13SF4F3jBk6pnD_3-ZS1exwyAerQtll4Z5a9rKj0Ookg/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.f5uvh0ld03f1>and
   watch the recordings.
   
<https://creativecommons.org/2026/05/06/how-can-equitable-access-to-heritage-help-solve-global-challenges-an-exploratory-dialogue/>
    @Brigitte Vézina <[email protected]> @Dee Harris
   <[email protected]>

*Online safety laws and age-verification in EU*


   - The EU's age verification app is technically ready
   
<https://www.politico.eu/article/eu-says-age-verification-app-is-technically-ready?ref=internet.exchangepoint.tech>,
   von der Leyen announced, telling online platforms they have "no more
   excuses" for not checking users' ages. The app lets people verify their age
   via passport, national ID, or trusted providers like banks, without
   platforms logging any personal data. The Commission also set out a new
   recommendation
   
<https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/commission-sets-out-common-approach-eu-wide-age-verification-technologies,>
   reiterating its approach.
   - The French Senate approved the social media ban for under-15s,
   becoming the first EU chamber to do so. The French law is relevant to
   Wikimedia: the text explicitly excludes from its scope online encyclopedias
   or platforms for developing and sharing free software. This is an important
   precedent. WMEU will work towards national laws and any eventual EU-level
   framework following suit.
   - Greece has announced plans
   <https://www.euractiv.com/news/greece-to-ban-anonymity-on-social-media/>
   to end anonymity on social media, requiring platforms to link all accounts
   to verified real identities. Most Wikimedia editors contribute
   pseudonymously or anonymously. Any mandatory real-identity verification
   regime, whether national or EU-wide, would be incompatible with how
   volunteer communities like ours function. We will monitor this future Greek
   proposal closely.
   - *Confused by all of this? Same. Some readings: *(1) A new IETF working
   draft
   
<https://mallory.github.io/draft-knodel-age-arch/draft-knodel-age-arch.html?ref=internet.exchangepoint.tech>
   sets out a technology-neutral framework for age assurance on the internet,
   comparing methods across service, device, and network enforcement layers.
   (2) Researchers from Harvard's Berkman Klein Center argue in Science
   
<https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aec7804?ref=internet.exchangepoint.tech>
   that blanket social media bans and age restrictions for children are blunt,
   often counterproductive tools; additional academic research
   <https://mikespecter.com/assets/pdf/AgeVerification.pdf> is starting to
   come out. (3) Overview of why these tools may be bad for privacy
   <https://spectrum.ieee.org/age-verification> rights.
   - *Still confused? Same. *WMF is working on a series of explainers that
   breakdown where this trend came from, how it affects our projects, what
   actions WMF and affiliates have taken around the world thus far, and what
   we need to do as a movement to prepare for how this trend will
advance. @Stan
   Adams <[email protected]> @Amanda Jardine <[email protected]>

*=== 🙏That's all (and only some of it) for now**🙏*
* ===*


Franziska Putz (she/her)

Senior Movement Advocacy Manager

Global Advocacy, Wikimedia Foundation

[email protected]

UTC Timezone
_______________________________________________
Publicpolicy mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to