On Sun, 2009-09-06 at 15:28 +0200, Fabio Forno wrote: > On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 3:18 PM, Kevin Smith<[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I think, really, what is needed here is just to go about business as > > normal, but use 198 at the stream level, so you know that everything's > > going to get through (albeit with no guarantee about when). > > There are several problems in this approach: > - messages can be delivered to the wrong resource and be lost at > application level > - you can flood the offline storage > - some events could get delivered when they are too old to have a > meaning and never know that they get late, unless you add some more > logic to the application
This might be solved by implementing AMP, but that doesn't seem to be very popular yet. ralphm
