-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 9/16/09 12:51 AM, Ralph Meijer wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-09-06 at 15:28 +0200, Fabio Forno wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 3:18 PM, Kevin Smith<[email protected]> wrote:
>>> I think, really, what is needed here is just to go about business as
>>> normal, but use 198 at the stream level, so you know that everything's
>>> going to get through (albeit with no guarantee about when).
>> There are several problems in this approach:
>> - messages can be delivered to the wrong resource and be lost at
>> application level
>> - you can flood the offline storage
>> - some events could get delivered when they are too old to have a
>> meaning and never know that they get late, unless you add some more
>> logic to the application
> 
> This might be solved by implementing AMP, but that doesn't seem to be
> very popular yet.

That might count as the understatement of the year. ;-)

/psa

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkqyK+EACgkQNL8k5A2w/vw7/gCg3yIjS46WlaY+J3fBbM05iaYd
KDoAnRckc378hN4gOmuHK4JcWJGgjx+4
=b3dx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to