On 8/5/11 7:26 AM, Ralph Meijer wrote: > On Fri, 2011-08-05 at 15:00 +0200, Tuomas Koski wrote: >> Hi, >> >> [..] >> >> Is the <affiliations> -element used on purpose or it is a typo? >> >> If the <affiliations> -element is really meant to be used, what's the >> use case for it to be used (and why not to use the event)? > > It is not a typo, as it also appears like this in the schema, but I > agree it is not consistent. As you suggest, there should probably be a > <affiliation/> element in the #event namespace, leaving out the > <affiliations/> wrapper around it. > > I'm not sure if we can just change this, though. I am not aware of any > deployments using this. > > stpeter? anyone else?
PubSub is not on my to-do list right now (still finishing up MUC edits), but I think you're right that this belongs in the #event namespace. I'll flag this as an open issue to be resolved when I next work on XEP-0060 (probably in September or October). Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
