Hi, (very old thread alert)
On 30 August 2011 19:19, Peter Saint-Andre <[email protected]> wrote: > On 8/5/11 7:26 AM, Ralph Meijer wrote: >> On Fri, 2011-08-05 at 15:00 +0200, Tuomas Koski wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> [..] >>> >>> Is the <affiliations> -element used on purpose or it is a typo? >>> >>> If the <affiliations> -element is really meant to be used, what's the >>> use case for it to be used (and why not to use the event)? >> >> It is not a typo, as it also appears like this in the schema, but I >> agree it is not consistent. As you suggest, there should probably be a >> <affiliation/> element in the #event namespace, leaving out the >> <affiliations/> wrapper around it. >> >> I'm not sure if we can just change this, though. I am not aware of any >> deployments using this. >> >> stpeter? anyone else? > > PubSub is not on my to-do list right now (still finishing up MUC edits), > but I think you're right that this belongs in the #event namespace. I'll > flag this as an open issue to be resolved when I next work on XEP-0060 > (probably in September or October). Is this issue still on the to-do list? If yes, no worries. Just verifying that it's not forgotten. Cheers, -- Tuomas
