That is: for "self" not self. <sigh>
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 11:00 PM, Alexis Richardson <[email protected]> wrote: > I'd like to throw in a +1 for self too. > > > On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 10:49 PM, Tim Bray <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 1:30 PM, Brett Slatkin <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> I'm doing this same "anti-aliasing" of feed URLs by using >>> //atom:feed/id elements. The "self" link (which is in the 0.2 spec) >>> doesn't work right in practice, methinks. Not sure how well we'll >>> define this for 0.3 though. >> >> Really? I thought the requirement to use the 'self' link was smart, >> precisely for the reason given in the spec. What's the problem? -Tim >> >
