Hey James, Thanks for following up in this forum. The HTTP continue is an interesting suggestion. I'm still putting together a reply to your original post (and Joseph Scott's) so hopefully I'll have more for us to discuss shortly.
-Brett On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 1:55 PM, James Holderness <[email protected]> wrote: > Joseph Scott wrote: >> Wouldn't simply including a hub challenge style verification for sent >> updates address this? > > It would help but, as you say, it's far from perfect. > > IMO, what you should be using is an HTTP continue expectation. > > http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec8.html#sec8.2.3 > > Regards > James >
