Hey Jeff, Thanks! I actually linked to webhooks.org in the article :). I agree that most of what I wrote about can be broken down to the webhook level, as can PSHB. Nevertheless, PSHB has a spec of a protocol while webhooks are still a concept (though, a wonderfully simple and powerful one) + guidelines. That's why processing/filtering was currently easier to define in the context of PSHB.
And -- I really like everything you've done with Scriptlets, DrEval, Hookah and other services. Still, those are technologies/tools for creating HTTP services and there's a lot to be done with defining their interaction and I'm really looking forward to that happening. The RESTful webhooks proposal is looking very promising. Cheers, Ivan On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 18:14, Jeff Lindsay <[email protected]> wrote: > You should look into the greater webhooks ecosystem (slowly being called the > Evented Web). It's all about the things your talking about here. > http://webhooks.org > Of particular interest might be Scriptlets (currently undergoing a major > upgrade) and DrEval. > -jeff > > On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 5:20 AM, Ivan Žužak <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> Just wanted to point to my new blog post - http://bit.ly/5PMXGq. In >> short, it's about extending PSHB to support not only real-time >> delivery of feeds but also their filtering and processing via 3rd >> party services. As I write in the post, I've discussed some of these >> ideas a few months back with Julien (over email) and Brett (over >> FriendFeed) but never got around to starting a broader discussion with >> concrete ideas. >> >> Feedback is welcome and if it's mostly positive I think that would be >> a good signal to start defining an extension to the protocol which >> supports this. >> >> Thanks, >> Ivan > > > > -- > Jeff Lindsay > http://webhooks.org -- Make the web more programmable > http://shdh.org -- A party for hackers and thinkers > http://tigdb.com -- Discover indie games > http://progrium.com -- More interesting things >
