Definitely. Sounds like an implementation feature though. It's probably a
bad idea to include the functionality of DrEval in the spec. DrEval can
always be used AS a remote service URI, which is the common interface this
spec should be based on (HTTP).

On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Ivan Žužak <[email protected]> wrote:

> "PubSubHubbub should support processing webhooks in the hub" is a
> really cool one-liner. Will probably quote you on that :)
>
> DrEval makes me think of dynamic filters where subscribers could
> specify a script which should be executed on notifications before
> sending them to the subscriber, instead of a remote service URI. This
> would also be a very interesting use case.
>
> Ivan
>
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 20:34, Jeff Lindsay <[email protected]> wrote:
> > So I just now actually fully read the blog post and it covers all the
> > scenarios I can think of for doing this sort of thing. Webhooks as
> filters
> > are not greatly utilized. I'm using DrEval to add filtering/processing to
> > Notify.io. HookPress exposes WP filters this way too. That's about it.
> > I think you're on to something, and it would help promote the idea of
> using
> > webhooks in this way: PubSubHubbub should support processing webhooks in
> the
> > hub, as you propose.
> > -jeff
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 11:20 AM, Ivan Žužak <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hey Jeff,
> >>
> >> Thanks! I actually linked to webhooks.org in the article :). I agree
> >> that most of what I wrote about can be broken down to the webhook
> >> level, as can PSHB. Nevertheless, PSHB has a spec of a protocol while
> >> webhooks are still a concept (though, a wonderfully simple and
> >> powerful one) + guidelines. That's why processing/filtering was
> >> currently easier to define in the context of PSHB.
> >>
> >> And -- I really like everything you've done with Scriptlets, DrEval,
> >> Hookah and other services. Still, those are technologies/tools for
> >> creating HTTP services and there's a lot to be done with defining
> >> their interaction and I'm really looking forward to that happening.
> >> The RESTful webhooks proposal is looking very promising.
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Ivan
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 18:14, Jeff Lindsay <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > You should look into the greater webhooks ecosystem (slowly being
> called
> >> > the
> >> > Evented Web). It's all about the things your talking about here.
> >> > http://webhooks.org
> >> > Of particular interest might be Scriptlets (currently undergoing a
> major
> >> > upgrade) and DrEval.
> >> > -jeff
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 5:20 AM, Ivan Žužak <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> Hi all,
> >> >>
> >> >> Just wanted to point to my new blog post - http://bit.ly/5PMXGq. In
> >> >> short, it's about extending PSHB to support not only real-time
> >> >> delivery of feeds but also their filtering and processing via 3rd
> >> >> party services. As I write in the post, I've discussed some of these
> >> >> ideas a few months back with Julien (over email) and Brett (over
> >> >> FriendFeed) but never got around to starting a broader discussion
> with
> >> >> concrete ideas.
> >> >>
> >> >> Feedback is welcome and if it's mostly positive I think that would be
> >> >> a good signal to start defining an extension to the protocol which
> >> >> supports this.
> >> >>
> >> >> Thanks,
> >> >> Ivan
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Jeff Lindsay
> >> > http://webhooks.org -- Make the web more programmable
> >> > http://shdh.org -- A party for hackers and thinkers
> >> > http://tigdb.com -- Discover indie games
> >> > http://progrium.com -- More interesting things
> >> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Jeff Lindsay
> > http://webhooks.org -- Make the web more programmable
> > http://shdh.org -- A party for hackers and thinkers
> > http://tigdb.com -- Discover indie games
> > http://progrium.com -- More interesting things
> >
>



-- 
Jeff Lindsay
http://webhooks.org -- Make the web more programmable
http://shdh.org -- A party for hackers and thinkers
http://tigdb.com -- Discover indie games
http://progrium.com -- More interesting things

Reply via email to