On 3/10/2010 1:49 PM, Bob Wyman wrote:
We did the same thing at PubSub.com with updates that came in from FeedMesh publishers and it worked very well. However, I would strongly suggest that you be very generous with the amount time you wait before polling a site that normally pushes data through PSHB. We should be able to rely on PSHB hubs to normally do the right thing. Polling thousands or millions of feeds, "just in case", is not a particularly good use of the network. At PubSub.com, I think we waited 48 hours before doing a "just in case" poll. Even that was probably too frequent.

Sorry, but I highly disagree. As I stated, PuSH is an augmentation to polling, not a replacement. If updates are missed due to any of the possible reasons (publisher bug, hub bug, subscriber bug), that data still needs to be published. 48 hours may be the best thing for your servers, but it's not the best thing for the customer.

I know for certain that if any of my projects were to go more than a couple hours without publisher content being updated, I'd have everyone from corporate CTOs to Joe Blogger beating down support's door. This already happens with polling, regardless of where the problem lies. PuSH simply increases the publisher's expectations and, if anything, they start getting upset even earlier if updates fall behind because they now expect near-real time publication.

--
Jay Rossiter | Software Engineer/System Administrator
Pioneering RSS Advertising Solutions

[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> | Phone: 503.896.6187 | Fax: 503.235.2216 Website: www.pheedo.com <http://www.pheedo.com/> | RSS: www.pheedo.info/index.xml <http://www.pheedo.info/index.xml>

Reply via email to