On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Jay Rossiter <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I would definitely argue that any firehose definition belongs nowhere > near individual feeds. It's far too generalized, and not likely to be used > by most subscribers. > > I think that this could very easily be an extension of how PuSH already > works, just by adding two new modes. > > When a subscriber discovers a feed with PuSH enabled, they have the option > to query the hub (e.g.) > > &hub.mode=listmodes (or discovery, or query, or ...) > > The hub returns a newline separated list of modes that it supports: > > subscribe [<0/1> <URI/email>] > unsubscribe > firehose [<0/1> <URI/email>] > unfirehose > publish [<0/1> <URI/email>] > yummy. love it. Jud
