I wouldn't say it competes with Push. I think it's more targetted toward "internal" use. I wish it was compatible with Push though.
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 5:32 PM, Eric Mill <[email protected]> wrote: > So is this basically a competing protocol to PuSH? Is it possible to > implement a PuSH hub on top of Amazon SNS? > > Also, how does SNS compare to PuSH in terms of complexity to > implement, as a client (not a hub)? > > -- Eric > > On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Juvenn Woo <[email protected]> wrote: > > It's nice, though I'd hope it was built on PuSH. > > > > Best, > > -- > > Juvenn Woo ♫ > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 10:39 PM, Darren Bounds <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> FYI: Just saw Werner announce this earlier today. Obviously a lot of > >> parallels with PuSH. > >> > >> "Amazon SNS provides a simple web services interface that can be used > >> to create topics you want to notify applications (or people) about, > >> subscribe clients to these topics, publish messages, and have these > >> messages delivered over clients’ protocol of choice (i.e. HTTP, email, > >> etc.). Amazon SNS delivers notifications to clients using a “push” > >> mechanism that eliminates the need to periodically check or “poll” for > >> new information and updates." > >> > >> http://aws.amazon.com/sns/ > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> darren bounds > >> [email protected] > >> > >> > >> -- > >> To unsubscribe, reply using "remove me" as the subject. > > > > >
