On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 11:43 AM, Andrew Badera <[email protected]> wrote:
> @Eric Mill -- you would probably use SNS on top of PuSH, not vice
> versa, wouldn't you?

Semantically you're probably right, but I think we mean the same thing.

>
> ∞ Andy Badera
> ∞ +1 518-641-1280 Google Voice
> ∞ This email is: [ ] bloggable [x] ask first [ ] private
> ∞ Google me: http://www.google.com/search?q=andrew%20badera
>
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 11:38 AM, Julien Genestoux
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I wouldn't say it competes with Push. I think it's more targetted toward
>> "internal" use.
>> I wish it was compatible with Push though.
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 5:32 PM, Eric Mill <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> So is this basically a competing protocol to PuSH?  Is it possible to
>>> implement a PuSH hub on top of Amazon SNS?
>>>
>>> Also, how does SNS compare to PuSH in terms of complexity to
>>> implement, as a client (not a hub)?
>>>
>>> -- Eric
>>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Juvenn Woo <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> > It's nice, though I'd hope it was built on PuSH.
>>> >
>>> > Best,
>>> > --
>>> > Juvenn Woo ♫
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 10:39 PM, Darren Bounds <[email protected]>
>>> > wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> FYI: Just saw Werner announce this earlier today. Obviously a lot of
>>> >> parallels with PuSH.
>>> >>
>>> >> "Amazon SNS provides a simple web services interface that can be used
>>> >> to create topics you want to notify applications (or people) about,
>>> >> subscribe clients to these topics, publish messages, and have these
>>> >> messages delivered over clients’ protocol of choice (i.e. HTTP, email,
>>> >> etc.). Amazon SNS delivers notifications to clients using a “push”
>>> >> mechanism that eliminates the need to periodically check or “poll” for
>>> >> new information and updates."
>>> >>
>>> >> http://aws.amazon.com/sns/
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> --
>>> >> darren bounds
>>> >> [email protected]
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> --
>>> >> To unsubscribe, reply using "remove me" as the subject.
>>> >
>>> >
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to