W00t! Best news of the month :) On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 10:27 PM, Brett Slatkin <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hey all, > > I've been on vacation. Been talking this whole thing over with the > FeedBurner guys too and they've got some good ideas on how to > normalize all of these resource/feed proxying issues with a pretty > simple convention. They're working on writing up a small draft to > explain how it works. In the meantime, the plan is to pass through > third-party hub links without modification since FeedBurner now serves > feeds without replication delay issues. > > -Brett > > On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Julien Genestoux > <[email protected]> wrote: > > I guess it would help to have someone from the feedburner feed come into > the > > discussion at this point :( > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 10:42 PM, Waleed Abdulla <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> > >>> Currently, not only it replaces it, but it fails to do the notification > >>> at the same time :( > >> > >> So is this a bug with feedburner, or is it by design that they don't > pass > >> the notifications along? > >> In other words, should I start ignoring "hub" tags in any feedburner > feed > >> and put it on the polling schedule instead? > >> > > > > >
