> Personally I see PubSubHubbub as the distribution framework, independent > of format or semantics. Just like you have different formats and > semantics available on the web (HTML, Atom, JSON, etc), you could have > different formats and semantics being distributed through the framework.
Yes, this is where I'm at, too. It seems like we're getting there though. It just seems like (and I could be wrong!) there is a lot of bias towards Atom/feed semantics. Even the tiniest structure is a constraint to use cases and adoption. That's all I'm saying. Also just the marketing. Is it about feeds or is it a distribution framework? Because it sounds like the former and that's what people think that I talk to and they decide it's not worth messing with. -- Jeff Lindsay http://progrium.com
